Quote
PHDram
Some states like Texas for instance will likely view the issue as a personal decision.
Well the people who have the political power in those states will likely frame the issues in that particular way.
Doesn't mean the entire state sees it that way. And it does not mean that way of framing it is valid.
Meanwhile Waterfield's question is really this--how SHOULD the issue be framed? Is it really simply a matter of choice and if so why? And how does that argument stack up against the public health and safety argument?
Do people really have a right to risk infecting others? Why?
Those are just my "thinking aloud" thoughts.
If you would, answer Waterfield, not me. You 2 have better discussions.
....
