Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

The term “herd immunity”

October 03, 2020 06:21AM
Quote

from The term “herd immunity,” which has been around for more than a century, has found its way into politicized discussions about how to overcome the COVID-19 pandemic.
Public health experts agree that it is a questionable strategy.
The number of infections that would be required in order to reach community immunity would bring significant death and illness.
For a term that’s at least 100 years old, "herd immunity" has gained new life in 2020.


[www.politifact.com]

...

And as recently as last week, Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) sparked a heated debate at a committee hearing when he suggested that the decline in COVID cases in New York City was due to herd or community immunity in the population rather than public health measures, such as wearing masks and social distancing. Dr. Anthony Fauci, the top U.S. infectious disease official, rebuked Paul, pointing out that only 22% of the city’s residents have COVID antibodies.

"If you believe 22% is herd immunity, I believe you’re alone in that," Fauci told the senator.

All this talk got us thinking: People seem pretty confused about herd immunity. What exactly does it mean and can it be used to combat COVID-19?

An uncertain strategy with great cost

Herd immunity, also called community or population immunity, refers to the point at which enough people are sufficiently resistant to a disease that an infectious agent is unlikely to spread from person to person. As a result, the whole community — including those who don’t have immunity — becomes protected.

People generally gain immunity in one of two ways: vaccination or infection. For most diseases in recent history — from smallpox and polio to diphtheria and rubella —vaccines have been the route to herd immunity. For the most highly contagious diseases, like measles, about 94% of the population needs to be immunized to achieve that level of protection. For COVID-19, scientists estimate the percentage falls between 50% to 70%.

Before the COVID pandemic, experts can’t recall examples in which governments intentionally turned to natural infection to achieve herd immunity. Generally, such a strategy could lead to widespread illness and death, said Dr. Carlos del Rio, an expert in infectious disease and vaccines at the Emory University School of Medicine.

"It’s a terrible idea," del Rio said. "It’s basically giving up on public health."

A new, large study found fewer than 1 in 10 Americans have antibodies to SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19. Even in the hardest-hit areas, like New York City, estimates of immunity among residents are about 25%.

To reach 50% to 70% immunity would mean about four times as many people getting infected and an "incredible number of deaths," said Josh Michaud, associate director of global health policy at KFF. Even those who survive could suffer severe consequences to their heart, brain and other organs, potentially leaving them with lifelong disabilities. (KHN is an editorially independent program of KFF.)

"It’s not a strategy to pursue unless your goal is to pursue suffering and death," Michaud said.

What’s more, some scientists say natural immunity may not even be feasible for COVID-19. While most people presumably achieve some degree of protection after being infected once, cases of people who recovered from the disease and were reinfected have raised questions about how long natural immunity lasts and whether someone with immunity could still spread the virus.

Even the method scientists are using to measure immunity — blood tests that detect antibodies to the coronavirus — may not be an accurate indicator of who is protected against COVID-19, said Dr. Stuart Ray, an infectious disease expert at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.

With so many unanswered questions, he concluded: "We can’t count on natural herd immunity as a way to control this epidemic."

Vaccines, on the other hand, can be made to trigger stronger immunity than natural infection, Ray said. That’s why people who acquire a natural tetanus infection, for example, are still advised to get the tetanus vaccine. The hope is that vaccines being developed for COVID-19 will provide the same higher level of immunity.

But what about Sweden?

In the political debate around COVID-19, proponents of a natural herd immunity strategy often point to Sweden as a model. Although the Scandinavian country imposed fewer economic shutdown measures, its death rate is less than that in the U.S., Paul said at Wednesday’s Senate hearing.

But health experts — including Fauci during the same hearing — argue that’s a flawed comparison. The U.S. has a much more diverse population, with vulnerable groups like Black and Hispanic Americans being disproportionately affected by the coronavirus, said Dr. Jon Andrus, an epidemiology expert at the George Washington University Milken Institute School of Public Health. The U.S. also has greater population density, especially on the coasts, he said.

When compared with other Scandinavian countries, Sweden’s death toll is much higher. It has had 5,880 deaths linked to COVID-19 so far, according to data from Johns Hopkins University. That’s nearly 58 deaths per 100,000 residents — several times higher than the death rates of 5 or 6 per 100,000 in Norway and Finland. In fact, as a result of COVID-19, Sweden has recorded its highest death toll since a famine swept the country 150 years ago. And cases are on the rise.

Despite that level of loss, it’s still unclear if Sweden has reached the threshold for herd immunity. A study by the country’s public health agency found that by late April only 7% of residents in Stockholm had antibodies for COVID-19. In other Swedish cities, the percentage was even lower.

Those findings mirror other studies around the globe. Researchers reported that in several cities across Spain, Switzerland and the U.S. — with the exception of New York City — less than 10% of the population had COVID-19 antibodies by June, despite months of exposure and high infection rates. The results led commentators in the medical research journal The Lancet to write, "In light of these findings, any proposed approach to achieve herd immunity through natural infection is not only highly unethical, but also unachievable."

Herd immunity is still far off

The bottom line, medical experts say, is that natural herd immunity is an uncertain strategy, and attempts to pursue it could result in a slew of unnecessary deaths. A vaccine, whenever one becomes available, would offer a safer route to community-wide protection.

Until then, they emphasize there is still plenty to do to counter the pandemic. Wearing masks, practicing social distancing, hand-washing and ramping up testing and contact tracing have all proven to help curb the virus’s spread.

"As we wait for new tools to be added to the toolbox," Andrus said, "we have to keep reminding ourselves that there are measures in this very moment that we could be using to save lives."

***

Our Sources

The Lancet, A history of herd immunity, Sept. 19, 2020

The Washington Post, New Trump pandemic adviser pushes controversial ‘herd immunity’ strategy, worrying public health officials, Aug. 31, 2020

U.S. Senate, HELP Committee Hearing, Sept. 23, 2020

ABC, Trump's ABC News town hall: Full transcript, Sept. 15, 2020

Mayo Clinic, Herd immunity and COVID-19 (coronavirus): What you need to know, June 6, 2020

Interview, Dr. Carlos del Rio, executive associate dean of Emory University School of Medicine, Sept. 25, 2020

The Lancet, Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in a large nationwide sample of patients on dialysis in the USA: a cross-sectional study, Sept. 25, 2020

Interview, Josh Michaud, associate director of global health policy at KFF, Sept. 23, 2020

STAT News, Scientists are reporting several cases of Covid-19 reinfection — but the implications are complicated, Aug. 28, 2020

Interview, Dr. Stuart Ray, Vice Chair of Medicine for Data Integrity and Analytics at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Sept. 24, 2020

Interview, Dr. Jon Andrus, adjunct professor of global health at George Washington University Milken Institute School of Public Health, Sept. 24, 2020

Johns Hopkins University Coronavirus Resource Center, Mortality analyses, Sept. 28, 2020

Business Insider, Sweden has recorded its highest death toll since a famine swept through the country 150 years ago, Aug. 20, 2020

The Washington Post, As debate over Sweden’s covid-19 response continues, cases in the country are on the rise, Sept. 25, 2020

The Guardian, Just 7.3% of Stockholm had Covid-19 antibodies by end of April, study shows, May 21, 2020

JAMA Internal Medicine, Seroprevalence of Antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 in 10 Sites in the United States, March 23-May 12, 2020, July 21, 2020

The Lancet, SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in COVID-19 hotspots, July 6, 2020



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/03/2020 06:23AM by zn.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  new covid-19 thread

zn341August 21, 2020 02:04AM

  7 months later: what we know about Covid-19 & questions that remain

zn297August 21, 2020 02:14AM

  great summary ZN

ferragamo79263August 21, 2020 08:27AM

  Hong Kong reports 'first case' of virus reinfection

SeattleRam170August 24, 2020 02:19PM

  Re: Doctors Worldwide Are Recording More Deaths Due To Lockdowns Than To Covid-19

ramBRO194August 21, 2020 02:58PM

  Covid-19 Is Creating a Wave of Heart Disease

zn194August 21, 2020 04:52PM

  Re: Covid-19 Is Creating a Wave of Heart Disease

ramBRO183August 21, 2020 05:27PM

  Hundreds More Have Died At Home In L.A. Experts Say COVID-19 Is The Culprit

ramBRO156September 04, 2020 04:53PM

  Re: new covid-19 thread

reggae214August 23, 2020 03:10PM

  Condolences

ramBRO148August 24, 2020 01:20PM

  Re: new covid-19 thread

zn167August 24, 2020 01:38PM

  Supercomputer analyzes Covid-19

Atlantic Ram304September 02, 2020 04:13PM

  This is actually very interesting

NewMexicoRam169September 02, 2020 04:55PM

  The term “herd immunity”

zn139October 03, 2020 06:21AM

  Massachusetts Study Finds No Rise In Suicides During Pandemic Lockdown

ramBRO142October 21, 2020 03:09PM

  Maybe not suicides but....

Ramgator258October 21, 2020 05:53PM

  Why the last sentence if indeed they saw no uptick in occurances?

roman18116October 22, 2020 08:03AM

  Re: Why the last sentence if indeed they saw no uptick in occurances?

waterfield85October 22, 2020 10:22AM

  Re: Why the last sentence if indeed they saw no uptick in occurances?

roman18106October 22, 2020 11:05AM

  Re: Why the last sentence if indeed they saw no uptick in occurances?

PHDram255October 22, 2020 06:19PM

  Re: Why the last sentence if indeed they saw no uptick in occurances?

ramBRO114October 22, 2020 06:22PM

  another study, same issue

zn126October 23, 2020 02:12AM

  Nonsense

PHDram115October 23, 2020 03:38AM

  far from it

zn111October 23, 2020 03:55AM

  I brought it up because that us what you said

PHDram117October 23, 2020 07:27AM

  read your own sentence

zn83October 23, 2020 07:50AM

  Yeah that's I thought

PHDram109October 23, 2020 08:01AM

  Re: Yeah that's I thought

ramBRO121October 23, 2020 08:58AM

  Re: Yeah that's I thought

zn82October 23, 2020 09:13AM

  my bad

PHDram117October 23, 2020 09:48AM

  so true!!!!!!!

ferragamo79112October 23, 2020 09:20AM