Quote
JimYoungblood53
most of the other posters are harmless but he
says whatever, and apparently never gets challenged
One recent thing he said was, "His defensive scheme is @#$%& and is used by a coach playing scared. Morris needs to grow some balls."
So, he hates the scheme. Fine. But saying Morris needs to grow balls? Or someone saying he does not have the stones to do this or that?
Seems personal and hateful.
But the problem is compounded by Oldnotdead because he is posting things that lack the merit of being truthful.
If he did once ounce of homework we would not have said over and over again that Morris changed Staley's scheme, that Morris
was running a different kind of zone than Staley's. He posted so many erroneous things it was comical.
But, to the people over wherever he is, they must think he is smart. I wonder if he could illustrate his opinions or does he just
say things based on "his eyes", or whatever.
I wonder if you looked at all his posts about Morris and Staley if the words "match zone" or "quarters match" or any of the common terms. I'd be curious
because you cannot discuss Morris' scheme without using them.
If is one thing for Oldnotdead to call Morris a "coward" and question if he has the "stones" to run a different defense.
That's just hate.
It is another to post things provably wrong-Like Morris was not running same scheme as Staley.. he was not
saying it was the same scheme with Morris putting his spin on it, that the specific calls in certain games
were different, but the scheme was different, similar to what he ran in Atlanta or wherever. He never made
the connection that the scheme was from the Fangio tree. . . Morris learned the Staley
scheme and still runs it to this day. . .
There may be some who still believe that Morris is running something he brought with him from Atlanta.
So questioning Morris' testicular fortitude is hate--but posting false things when you have the ability
to Google is plain ignorance.
Oldnotdead really triggers you, doesn’t he, 53?
Fascinating…
