And Hav, too, for that matter.
Brockers is on a fairly deep DL of quality starters and rotational players. Hav, too, at RT. Either player could have their snaps replaced without big dropoffs.
But that’s not the case with Woods. Not only is he our best WR, but the dropoff behind him is pretty significant. In fact, a lot of us want to see a vertical threat WR ADDED to this group. I would be VERY surprised to see Woods traded. The cap savings would not nearly be worth the hole created, especially when welcoming our new QB.
Brockers or Hav? Sure, if the value is there via pick or player added. Either could yield a net overall gain for the Rams, IMO.
