Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

You had me do a double take...

May 02, 2026 05:23PM
Option 5! I missed it... Although I did sort of add it in my initial response to Albany.

And then BC who I thought had a good post but I was going to push back a bit on the "Such a great move"... That is debatable imo. It's more like 51-49 in favor of Simpson, and only after walking through a lot of chess moves and concessions... and still that's my opinion.

The "competing with Bennett for QB2" line is almost certainly ear candy for Stafford and for Bennett himself. The real play is that Simpson is insurance... a capable backup if something happens to Stafford, and the heir apparent when Stafford eventually walks away. Not that Bennett wouldn't have been a capable backup, but you're filling a roster hole and planning for the future in one move.
You also have to factor in that the Rams already made one win-now move before the draft... trading for Trent McDuffie and signing Watson and a few other moves. So this pick isn't really a "punt on the window" the way critics are framing it. And the Rams' arsenal is solid enough that they can probably round out the roster with capable players in free agency.

I believe Snead when he says it was a long, difficult decision... it's more complex than we know because we aren't privy to the info. Someone said the Rams are playing chess while the rest of the league is playing checkers… lol, well, a few teams are playing checkers but most are playing chess too. You only have to be a step ahead to be successful, and I generally think the Rams are that step. The catch is that unlike chess, there are way more variables, and a lot of them are out of your control. Even if you're 6 moves ahead and the rest of the league is 5, that doesn't mean every move pans out.

So the jury is still out. But if the Rams don't win the Super Bowl this year and it's close... the kind of close a blue-chip player would've afforded... there will be people looking back at this draft and asking why.

The Rams are averaging a Super Bowl win every 20-something years. You have to respect the window when you're in it. Two years from now, McVay could retire with Stafford. Puka gets hurt. Simpson turns out to be backup quality. Defenses adjust to 13 personnel once everyone's running it. The defense doesn't adapt to more physical teams... All unlikely, but possible. Who knew the GSOT window would be 3 or 4 years before slamming shut for 22 years? Stuff happens.

I don't care about a winning record for a decade. I want a Super Bowl — for me, for Stafford, for everyone. Hopefully this is the right move to get there. The window is open... I think the Rams understand that. So the moves made are OK. to what I would have done probably... All for "f dem picks" to grab a QB next year or maybe even better a vet QB should one become available.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Crystal ball time: what if the Rams didn't draft Simpson?

AlbaNY_Ram605May 02, 2026 05:21AM

  I like option 3

Atlantic Ram120May 02, 2026 06:09AM

  Rams will be regarded as geniuses if...

L.A.Rams106May 02, 2026 06:31AM

  Re: Crystal ball time: what if the Rams didn't draft Simpson?

six2stack75May 02, 2026 08:00AM

  This shows exactly why it was such a great move

BC Ramsfan90May 02, 2026 09:10AM

  Option 5 for me

Ramsdude90May 02, 2026 12:53PM

  You had me do a double take...

Atlantic Ram62May 02, 2026 05:23PM

  Re: You had me do a double take...

AlbaNY_Ram54May 02, 2026 06:18PM

  Re: Option 5 for me

AlbaNY_Ram71May 02, 2026 05:44PM

  All valid points AlbaNY except

Ramsdude50May 03, 2026 01:59AM

  Re: All valid points AlbaNY except

AlbaNY_Ram49May 03, 2026 04:58AM

  Baker and Mac Jones

Ridgewood Ram49May 04, 2026 01:10PM

  Re: Baker and Mac Jones

AlbaNY_Ram50May 04, 2026 02:08PM

  The thing about the Simpson pick

stlramz44May 03, 2026 08:00AM

  Re: Crystal ball time: what if the Rams didn't draft Simpson?

sfbayram42May 03, 2026 01:19AM

  Sorry, but I struggle with the premise of the question, itself

RockRam77May 03, 2026 02:59AM

  Re: Sorry, but I struggle with the premise of the question, itself

AlbaNY_Ram70May 04, 2026 04:41AM

  Re: Sorry, but I struggle with the premise of the question, itself

nicecatchellard50May 04, 2026 10:22AM

  OR, get Joe Burrow in trade or FA

Ridgewood Ram57May 04, 2026 01:04PM

  If only it was that easy ...

AlbaNY_Ram71May 04, 2026 04:04PM

  Re: If only it was that easy ...

Ridgewood Ram50May 05, 2026 11:04AM

  Problem is, that's not a plan.... it's a wish.... and not a likely one.

RockRam61May 05, 2026 12:44PM

  Re: Problem is, that's not a plan.... it's a wish.... and not a likely one.

Ridgewood Ram39May 06, 2026 09:17AM