<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>So, assuming Rams stay at 26, what position do you think is the pick?</title>
<description> Poll: What position is the Rams pick at 26, given best available info today? I know, I know. It will depend on who falls. But for this fun exercise let’s just go with best available info and our gut feeling.

QB
OT
TE
WR
DL
ILB
CB
S

Seems that this well balanced Ram roster will permit Snead to go in at least 8 different directions. A very good scenario, indeed.</description><link>https://ramsrule.com/herd/read.php?19,1163362,1163362#msg-1163362</link><lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 04:02:32 -0400</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Phorum 5.2.18</generator>
<item>
<guid>https://ramsrule.com/herd/read.php?19,1163362,1163460#msg-1163460</guid>
<title>TE... well I'm the turd in the punch bowl...</title><link>https://ramsrule.com/herd/read.php?19,1163362,1163460#msg-1163460</link><description><![CDATA[ Because as important as the position is I NEVER want the Ram's to draft one.... not with ANY pick down to their last. Why? Because they won't use him, not as a TE that is.. I don''t think the Rams should even have a TE - I think they should just have another OL'man lined up in that position. and I do not think that would be a 'BAD' thing. And this goes WAY past McVay. It's been like since I started at a Ram fan back in... um..... the mid 1600's. The great ones we had, and we did have some, were exceptions and I think the respective coaches HATED that they were good at being a true TE and resented them for it.<br /><br />Ok, some sarcasm... a lot maybe? :laughing But in essence I stand by it.... no TE's... get a OL instead. - JamesJM]]></description>
<dc:creator>JamesJM</dc:creator>
<category>RamsFootballFans.com</category><pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 01:17:45 -0400</pubDate></item>
<item>
<guid>https://ramsrule.com/herd/read.php?19,1163362,1163459#msg-1163459</guid>
<title>I vote RB</title><link>https://ramsrule.com/herd/read.php?19,1163362,1163459#msg-1163459</link><description><![CDATA[ Not sure why. Just maybe the KW negotiations don’t work out.]]></description>
<dc:creator>Ridgewood Ram</dc:creator>
<category>RamsFootballFans.com</category><pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 00:59:56 -0400</pubDate></item>
<item>
<guid>https://ramsrule.com/herd/read.php?19,1163362,1163458#msg-1163458</guid>
<title>Re: So, assuming Rams stay at 26, what position do you think is the pick?</title><link>https://ramsrule.com/herd/read.php?19,1163362,1163458#msg-1163458</link><description><![CDATA[ I feel that if the Rams do not trade down and do pick at #26 it means that they feel that there is a game-changer available there. And, it means that the player is head and shoulders above what we have now. With this thinking I think it rules out several positions such as QB, DL (both IDL and OLB) and probably even WR. I don't think that there is a QB better than Stafford, even giving them 2 or 3 years. For DL, OLB and even WR I don't think so either.<br /><br />So, I think RB (which was not an option) could be a possibility<br />I also think TE could be an option<br />I also think that ILB, CB or even SAF could be an option<br /><br />But, all of the above will really depend on all the Rams evaluations, which half of we don't have information about. I think especially about which young man really loves football. To be a game-changer you have to have <b><u>excellent physical attributes and love the game</u></b>.]]></description>
<dc:creator>Singapore Ram</dc:creator>
<category>RamsFootballFans.com</category><pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 00:48:36 -0400</pubDate></item>
<item>
<guid>https://ramsrule.com/herd/read.php?19,1163362,1163457#msg-1163457</guid>
<title>I Couldn't Vote</title><link>https://ramsrule.com/herd/read.php?19,1163362,1163457#msg-1163457</link><description><![CDATA[ IMO ILB is the biggest need, but the Rams never draft one early.... &amp; just watching football you know the OTs will miss at least 4 games so for me that's #2 even though they probably won't be starters at the first of the year, &amp; CB would be #3<br />DL could use some depth but not in the 1st.<br /><br />I know right now TE is the glamor pick but for me if the top 2 aren't there you can find one later, no reaches<br />QB?? Come on... I'm not sure if there's a 1st rounder out there.]]></description>
<dc:creator>ScRAM</dc:creator>
<category>RamsFootballFans.com</category><pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 00:36:47 -0400</pubDate></item>
<item>
<guid>https://ramsrule.com/herd/read.php?19,1163362,1163454#msg-1163454</guid>
<title>Yikes, I should explain....</title><link>https://ramsrule.com/herd/read.php?19,1163362,1163454#msg-1163454</link><description><![CDATA[ No doubt our offensive needs the most help...not sure I see a path to fully fixing that.... I do see a path to making the D even better.]]></description>
<dc:creator>JamesJM</dc:creator>
<category>RamsFootballFans.com</category><pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 00:28:15 -0400</pubDate></item>
<item>
<guid>https://ramsrule.com/herd/read.php?19,1163362,1163453#msg-1163453</guid>
<title>Wow, I'm in the majority... so far that is...</title><link>https://ramsrule.com/herd/read.php?19,1163362,1163453#msg-1163453</link><description><![CDATA[ CB....right now I can think of any position that 'could' make a bigger impact on 2025 success. But obviously that would mean nailing a great CB. Short of that... lots of positions spring to mind.<br /><br />LB. OL. And the most pressing concern is QB... although NOT this year, I don't think. But that's a position you get when you can. The alternative is the 90's.]]></description>
<dc:creator>JamesJM</dc:creator>
<category>RamsFootballFans.com</category><pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 00:27:04 -0400</pubDate></item>
<item>
<guid>https://ramsrule.com/herd/read.php?19,1163362,1163448#msg-1163448</guid>
<title>Well why not</title><link>https://ramsrule.com/herd/read.php?19,1163362,1163448#msg-1163448</link><description><![CDATA[ Gonna go QB. I have a feeling the Rams are going to prioritize insulating themselves against being held over the barrel again.<br /><br />How they go about with their needs from there it would be tougher. Though maybe they move down just a bit and then overdraft one with that pick lessening the blow.]]></description>
<dc:creator>merlin</dc:creator>
<category>RamsFootballFans.com</category><pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2025 23:57:47 -0400</pubDate></item>
<item>
<guid>https://ramsrule.com/herd/read.php?19,1163362,1163362#msg-1163362</guid>
<title>So, assuming Rams stay at 26, what position do you think is the pick?</title><link>https://ramsrule.com/herd/read.php?19,1163362,1163362#msg-1163362</link><description><![CDATA[ <b>Poll</b>: What position is the Rams pick at 26, given best available info today? <br/><br/>I know, I know. It will depend on who falls. But for this fun exercise let’s just go with best available info and our gut feeling.<br /><br />QB<br />OT<br />TE<br />WR<br />DL<br />ILB<br />CB<br />S<br /><br />Seems that this well balanced Ram roster will permit Snead to go in at least 8 different directions. A very good scenario, indeed.]]></description>
<dc:creator>Rams43</dc:creator>
<category>RamsFootballFans.com</category><pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2025 12:56:10 -0400</pubDate></item>
</channel>
</rss>