Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: He did catch it

October 18, 2017 12:28PM
I won't argue the catch no catch thing with you...because your mind is made up on that.
I will say that it's definitely reviewable.

The more interesting play was in the 9th when ball went into ivy...Kiki held up his hand but played the ball anyway looked as if the Dodgers caught the Cubs in a base running blunder 2 guys on 3rd...runner clearly thought he was out...but umps ruled him back to 2nd. Didn't have a big problem with ruling other than the ump never made a decisive call to stop play
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Dodgers and baseball question

waterfield336October 17, 2017 09:16PM

  not sure this is 100% right, but........

21Dog160October 18, 2017 04:38AM

  Re: not sure this is 100% right, but........

waterfield151October 18, 2017 07:18AM

  he didn't catch it

ferragamo79171October 18, 2017 07:36AM

  He did catch it

waterfield148October 18, 2017 10:24AM

  Re: He did catch it

Headslap75191October 18, 2017 12:28PM

  Re: He did catch it

waterfield148October 18, 2017 03:38PM

  Re: He did catch it

Headslap75291October 19, 2017 09:01AM

  Ivy in the outfield

waterfield141October 19, 2017 10:12AM

  Re: he didn't catch it

Rampage2K-163October 19, 2017 11:52AM

  I don't mind a little subjectivity in sports...

JamesJM164October 18, 2017 09:48AM

  Speaking of strike zones-check this out

waterfield186October 19, 2017 10:34AM