October 09, 2019 04:13PM
I disagree on Fowler. I would sign him. This defense needs playmakers on the edge. He makes plays imo.

Not Littleton is a no brainer. Yes hes played very well but teams under wade have been reluctant to pay the ilbs alot of money. Well see...

Hill signed an extension. I dont believe hes a FA.

Peter's is the guy I keep wavering on.


Quote
Rams43
Yeah, it’s waaaaay early, but still... just for funsies, anyway.

After seeing the first 5 games, almost a third of the season, here are my opinions as to extending some key ‘20 Ram UFA’s. Caution: I’m coming down on the ruthless side so some posters might be surprised or offended.

Whitworth. Goner.
Blythe. He’s 50-50, but probably allowed to walk unless he really shines in the next 11 games.

I think that’s it on the significant O UFA’s. Now let’s do the much longer D list. And let’s don’t forget that the D currently seems to be the side struggling the most.

Fowler. Goner, because he just hasn’t earned that big payday as yet.
Brockers. Probably a goner. Salary too high based upon so-so production on field.
Talib. Goner. Father Time has caught up with this formerly great CB and his salary would be too high, anyway. More bang for the buck with other FA CB’s or a high draft pick.
Peters. Goner, unless he really blows it up in these next 11 games. Too hit and miss, too immature. I think the Rams move on.
Littleton. Extend. A no-brainer.
Zuerlein. Extend. Another no-brainer.
Troy Hill. Very iffy, better be willing to sign inexpensively.
Hager. Another iffy, better shine plus be willing to sign inexpensively.
Bortles. Goner because he’ll get a nice offer to perhaps be a starter elsewhere.
Fox. Can’t decide just yet. Need a larger sample. Better be willing to sign inexpensively, too.
Christian. Probably a goner. Seems very replaceable.

So I guess I only see 2 likely extensions out of the 11 significant upcoming UFA’s on D.

How do you guys see it?
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Some questions about pending ‘20 Ram UFA’s after watching the first 5 games...

Rams43631October 09, 2019 10:53AM

  Re: Some questions about pending ‘20 Ram UFA’s after watching the first 5 games...

RDU306October 09, 2019 11:15AM

  Re: Some questions about pending ‘20 Ram UFA’s after watching the first 5 games...

SeattleRam309October 09, 2019 06:22PM

  Re: Some questions about pending ‘20 Ram UFA’s after watching the first 5 games...

Rams43244October 09, 2019 06:45PM

  Re: Some questions about pending ‘20 Ram UFA’s after watching the first 5 games...

LMU93187October 11, 2019 03:24AM

  Re: Some questions about pending ‘20 Ram UFA’s after watching the first 5 games...

NorCalRamFan207October 09, 2019 07:57PM

  Re: Some questions about pending ‘20 Ram UFA’s after watching the first 5 games...

PHDram234October 09, 2019 04:13PM

  Re: Some questions about pending ‘20 Ram UFA’s after watching the first 5 games...

Rams43221October 09, 2019 05:23PM

  Re: Some questions about pending ‘20 Ram UFA’s after watching the first 5 games...

PHDram179October 10, 2019 05:56PM

  Re: Regarding these long term contracts....

dzrams176October 11, 2019 05:00AM

  Re: Some questions about pending ‘20 Ram UFA’s after watching the first 5 games...

no name185October 10, 2019 03:29PM

  October opinions...

LMU93245October 11, 2019 03:28AM

  Re: Some questions about pending ‘20 Ram UFA’s after watching the first 5 games...

Classicalwit167October 11, 2019 04:17AM

  Brockers is a curious case

LMU93244October 11, 2019 04:30AM

  Re: Brockers is a curious case

zn208October 11, 2019 04:46AM

  Re: Brockers is a curious case

LMU93170October 11, 2019 05:32AM

  Re: Brockers is a curious case

zn203October 11, 2019 05:50AM

  Re: Brockers is a curious case

21Dog288October 11, 2019 04:53AM

  that's doubtful

zn184October 11, 2019 05:21AM