Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

2018 Receiver Analysis using EPA

August 18, 2019 04:18PM
If you are not familiar with the EPA metric please see:

[www.espn.com]

In short, EPA is considered the a better(than yards) metric for gauging the impact of a play on a team's chances of winning. Higher is better.

What I did here is determine the mean EPA for the 2018 regular season for any Rams player with greater than 20 receptions. Sorted by mean_epa

receiver mean_epa success_rate yards_gained plays
<chr> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <int>
1 C.Kupp 0.615 0.564 10.3 55
2 T.Higbee 0.579 0.618 8.59 34
3 B.Cooks 0.463 0.573 10.3 117
4 R.Woods 0.460 0.592 9.38 130
5 J.Reynolds 0.213 0.5 7.73 52
6 G.Everett 0.211 0.52 6.4 50
7 T.Gurley 0.0870 0.506 7.16 81

Success_rate is the percent of plays where the player earned an epa > 0.

This is the top 10 for the NFL; min 50 plays

receiver mean_epa success_rate yards_gained plays
<chr> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <int>
1 T.Lockett 1.03 0.714 13.8 70
2 M.Williams 0.700 0.578 9.72 83
3 S.Watkins 0.663 0.618 9.44 55
4 T.Boyd 0.660 0.630 9.52 108
5 C.Kupp 0.615 0.564 10.3 55
6 T.Hilton 0.595 0.592 10.6 120
7 M.Thomas 0.592 0.653 9.56 147
8 J.Gordon 0.565 0.521 10.4 71
9 R.Higgins 0.556 0.585 10.8 53
10 A.Jeffery 0.550 0.587 9.13 92

Kupp is interesting here. Especially in comparison to Cooks--similar ypc, and success rate--but Kupp has a much higher mean EPA. This tells me that Kupp is likely gaining more 1st downs and TDs. Gaining his yards in more important situations.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  2018 Receiver Analysis using EPA

cool_hand_luke391August 18, 2019 04:18PM

  Re: Kupp is our best receiver

merlin89August 19, 2019 08:15AM