and have some areas of similarity by way of the idea of construction...some of those materials....the seating.....but IMO the vikes stadium was built for the place it is at.....the weather, maybe the surroundings. Yes it's totally angular.....it's "wedge like"

The Rams place is curvy....it has more of a feel of waves....it's next to the ocean.....They can be from the same architectural group but be different. You're in a different area of the country....

Personally I like curves in architecture.....they seem to pass time better....hard pointed buildings seem to date themselves quicker IMO.....Much like cars....you can look at a Porsche circa 1970 and it looks fresh today ....The Ferrari 365 GTB is still considered maybe the most beautiful cars ever done.....A Cobra is still bad ass today.....Then you go into like a Lambo Countach and it's totally dated.....it's all rigid wedged out lines.....

Then again I must admit I love Art Deco and it's more angular....but it has very clean lines as well....

You can look at the stuff that the IMO most brilliant building/home designer of all time Frank Lloyd Wright and his stuff was very angular for the most part.....but they fit the area his designs we placed....and they stand the test of time as well....

Overall I think the RAMS design is a more complex overall design....for that reason I think that will be the reason it stands up for architectural design over the vikes/falcons/texans....styles.....