Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Huh? I didn't bash the writer

May 24, 2019 06:50AM
Quote
zn
Quote
max

Whether Florio is insincere or not doesn't preclude him from wanting attention..

And the truth is no one is a mind reader so they have no idea what his motives are. I will say this though. If you;re a writer who craves attention, how high does writing about Goff rank on your list of topics that will get you national, widespread attention?

If we did a survey of hot topics being discussed in the sports media right now, does Goff even make the top 100? Is writing about Goff right now a big career making move?

And then there's this. We;re a Rams board. Anything said about Goff, we will be sensitive about. What are the odds a writer will be dismissively critical of Goff, without at least someone making it ad hominem and making the writer the issue? They're pretty high, right?

In reading sports media, no one knows a writer's motives. Those who claim to are the same as everyone else--they have no idea. They may claim they do but then that's just a type of rhetoric we see from fans...and that's all it is.

Meanwhile, I disagree with Florio, and I think he's wrong, and I think the idea that the Rams are hesitant about signing him to a 2nd contract is pretty misguided. So my disagreement is with the claim, and the argument. IMO bashing the writer adds nothing of value to that.

...

All I said is that he wants attention. And who wouldn't? Thats his business. He wants clicks and he gets them in all different ways. So now in the middle of May he calls into the Dan Patrick show and throws out his opinion on a big market QB who just lost the SB. He isn't wasting his time. He's not talking about Marcus Mariotta is he?

You seem to be getting locked in to something that someone else said about Florio and applying it to every poster. Im not bashing Florio for wanting attention. That aint me. This is regardless of whether I agree with him or not.

Also, the claim that you aren't seeking attention when you take a critical position on Goff because there are other bigger names to criticize is actually illogical.

Thats like saying I would never eat at an inexpensive restaurant if I could afford to eat at an expensive one.

And whether you agree or disagree with Florio is irrelevant to this discussion.



~ max ~
“The consciousness of good intentions disdains ambiguity.” - Alexander Hamilton



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 05/24/2019 06:52AM by max.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Florio: I would not be surprised if Goff doesn't get a second contract with the Rams."

RamBill1011May 23, 2019 02:58PM

  Re: Florio: I would not be surprised if Goff doesn't get a second contract with the Rams."

zn510May 23, 2019 03:16PM

  A little Vinny on this...

Rams43477May 23, 2019 03:19PM

  Florio: Not surprised if Goff doesn't get a 2nd contract with Rams

Anonymous User457May 23, 2019 04:08PM

  Re: Florio: Not surprised if Goff doesn't get a 2nd contract with Rams

cool_hand_luke255May 23, 2019 05:00PM

  Re: Florio: Not surprised if Goff doesn't get a 2nd contract with Rams

zn240May 23, 2019 09:04PM

  Florio: Not surprised if Goff doesn't get a 2nd contract: Well Played

Anonymous User349May 24, 2019 10:00AM

  Re: Florio: Not surprised if Goff doesn't get a 2nd contract: Well Played

zn228May 24, 2019 10:31AM

  Re: Florio: Not surprised if Goff doesn't get a 2nd contract: Well Played

Anonymous User192May 24, 2019 10:43AM

  I think people have valid points to be concerned about Goff...

jemach101May 24, 2019 01:43PM

  Re: Florio: Not surprised if Goff doesn't get a 2nd contract with Rams

cool_hand_luke294May 24, 2019 02:28PM

  Re: Florio: Not surprised if Goff doesn't get a 2nd contract with Rams

zn102May 24, 2019 04:28PM

  Re: Florio: Not surprised if Goff doesn't get a 2nd contract with Rams

cool_hand_luke93May 24, 2019 06:05PM

  Re: Florio: Not surprised if Goff doesn't get a 2nd contract with Rams

zn276May 24, 2019 08:11PM

  Re: Florio: Not surprised if Goff doesn't get a 2nd contract with Rams

cool_hand_luke193May 24, 2019 10:14PM

  Re: Florio: Not surprised if Goff doesn't get a 2nd contract with Rams

zn190May 25, 2019 07:03AM

  Losing Kupp was major. Just major.

NewMexicoRam166May 23, 2019 05:22PM

  Re: So he collapsed because he didn’t have Kupp?

Speed_Kills206May 23, 2019 05:29PM

  Re: So he collapsed because he didn’t have Kupp?

jim beam302May 24, 2019 07:25AM

  and the OL too

zn129May 23, 2019 09:38PM

  Re: and the OL too

waterfield123May 24, 2019 10:00AM

  Re: Excellent post

Speed_Kills316May 23, 2019 05:23PM

  Re: Florio: Not surprised if Goff doesn't get a 2nd contract with Rams

Classicalwit139May 23, 2019 06:46PM

  Re: Florio: Not surprised if Goff doesn't get a 2nd contract with Rams

zn129May 23, 2019 09:48PM

  ok hes not perfect

PHDram167May 23, 2019 07:19PM

  I think there are two different things here.

Saguaro158May 24, 2019 04:39AM

  Re: I think there are two different things here.

zn261May 24, 2019 05:26AM

  I don't give him the same leeway you do.

Saguaro110May 24, 2019 06:07AM

  Re: I don't give him the same leeway you do.

zn117May 24, 2019 07:33AM

  Re: been saying this forever...

spagsbacker214May 23, 2019 05:04PM

  Re: been saying this forever...Actually yes it is

BumRap117May 24, 2019 09:46AM

  Beyond stupid...

Ram49141May 23, 2019 07:31PM

  Florio has to say stuff like that to stay relevant

Rampage2K-144May 23, 2019 08:06PM

  Re: Florio has to say stuff like that to stay relevant

zn248May 23, 2019 09:59PM

  Re: Florio has to say stuff like that to stay relevant

Killrazor351May 24, 2019 12:47AM

  Re: Now this I agree with

Speed_Kills306May 24, 2019 03:03AM

  Re: Now this I agree with

Rampage2K-116May 24, 2019 05:58PM

  They are not mutually exclusive

max124May 24, 2019 04:59AM

  that's the nature of ad hominem attacks

zn161May 24, 2019 05:10AM

  Huh? I didn't bash the writer

max309May 24, 2019 06:50AM

  I didn't say you did

zn159May 24, 2019 07:25AM

  Re: that's the nature of ad hominem attacks

Rams43180May 24, 2019 08:20AM

  Re: that's the nature of ad hominem attacks

zn201May 24, 2019 08:34AM

  Re: that's the nature of ad hominem attacks

Rams43289May 24, 2019 09:01AM

  Re: that's the nature of ad hominem attacks

zn101May 24, 2019 09:11AM

  Re: that's the nature of ad hominem attacks

dzrams113May 24, 2019 01:14PM

  Re: that's the nature of ad hominem attacks

Rams43283May 24, 2019 02:09PM

  Re: that's the nature of ad hominem attacks

dzrams111May 24, 2019 03:44PM

  Re: that's the nature of ad hominem attacks

Rams43121May 25, 2019 06:02AM

  Re: that's the nature of ad hominem attacks

zn130May 25, 2019 07:43AM

  Re: that's the nature of ad hominem attacks

Rams43150May 25, 2019 08:19AM

  Re: that's the nature of ad hominem attacks

Rampage2K-165May 25, 2019 11:05AM

  Re: I think what you might be missing

Speed_Kills151May 25, 2019 11:44AM

  Re: Agreed on this summary....

dzrams104May 25, 2019 12:04PM

  Re: I think what you might be missing

Rampage2K-210May 25, 2019 12:07PM

  Re: I think what you might be missing

zn364May 25, 2019 12:27PM

  Re: I think what you might be missing

Rampage2K-106May 25, 2019 12:39PM

  Re: I think what you might be missing

zn75May 25, 2019 06:00PM

  Ace in the hole

moklerman167May 25, 2019 12:54PM

  Re: Ace in the hole

Rampage2K-142May 25, 2019 01:15PM

  Good work dz.... zn too

Speed_Kills104May 25, 2019 09:51AM

  He says Dak over Goff

no name217May 24, 2019 06:04AM

  Re: He says Dak over Goff

Classicalwit161May 24, 2019 08:30AM

  Re: He says Dak over Goff

zn195May 24, 2019 08:44AM

  Re: He says Dak over Goff

max126May 24, 2019 09:07AM

  Re: He says Dak over Goff

zn131May 24, 2019 09:16AM

  2 thoughts here

max159May 25, 2019 05:00AM

  Re: 2 thoughts here

zn109May 25, 2019 06:53AM

  the Bortles treatment

max125May 25, 2019 07:20AM

  Re: the Bortles treatment

zn222May 25, 2019 07:37AM

  Re: the Bortles treatment

max231May 25, 2019 08:28AM

  Re: the Bortles treatment

zn108May 25, 2019 09:19AM

  Re: the Bortles treatment

max192May 25, 2019 12:21PM

  Re: the Bortles treatment

zn214May 25, 2019 12:56PM

  Re: the Bortles treatment

max148May 25, 2019 01:17PM

  Re: the Bortles treatment

zn651May 25, 2019 02:00PM

  Re: the Bortles treatment

max167May 25, 2019 04:06PM

  Re: the Bortles treatment

zn173May 25, 2019 04:25PM

  Re: Why wouldn't that be expected?

dzrams192May 25, 2019 02:18PM

  Re: Good theoretical question...one I've alluded to on here...

dzrams241May 25, 2019 11:58AM

  Re: Good theoretical question...one I've alluded to on here...

zn417May 25, 2019 01:12PM

  Re: He says Dak was not a 1st rounder either

BumRap182May 24, 2019 09:52AM

  Re: He says Dak over Goff

cool_hand_luke103May 24, 2019 02:30PM

  Totally agree

Los Angeles Lenny189May 24, 2019 10:54AM

  Me: "I would be surprised if Florio is right."

alyoshamucci219May 24, 2019 11:19AM

  Even if he doesn't believe in Goff

no name168May 24, 2019 07:32PM

  Re: Even if he doesn't believe in Goff

cool_hand_luke126May 24, 2019 09:11PM

  here is McVay on Goff recently

Rampage2K-151May 25, 2019 11:11AM