imo. Life doesnt work that way because people are not robots. they are often irrational, emotional or simply approach issues from different points of view. These differences inevitably lead to disagreements and no matter how much consensus building one tries, there will be times where it just doesnt work, like now for instance. you can keep talking your talk, but i have interpreted what i have seen and read and developed my own opinions which are obviously quite different then yours. its unlikely we are going to come to an agreement.
Quote
zn
Quote
PHDram
i acknowledge that in a perfect world the draft runs the way you suggest in #1 and that it may possibility run that way in real life. the problem i have is that the world is NOT perfect. well meaning and congenial people will disagree even after hours of a consensus building process. for example in 2013 the draft went
1 Jadeveon Clowney
2 Greg Robinson
3 Blake Bortles
4 Sammy Watkins
5 Khalil Mack
obviously the rams choose robinson. however, its very possible that robsinson was NOT snead's PERSONAL choice for the position.
The Rams draft runs that way in real life, not in an ideal world.
And has since 2012.
There is abundant evidence to support that and absolutely none to contradict it.
I think some people are just hunting for speculative ways to blame and/or exonerate someone who for some reason they feel the need to blame or exonerate. Nothing out there supports speculation like that. I think even speculating that way is just looking for someone thing supports some kind of personal view of the situation. But again nothing backs it. I am a big-time Snead advocate myself and defended him in the 2017 off-season when some were claiming he was awful and had to go. But multiple sources, some inside the Rams hierarchy and some reporters allowed inside repeatedly across the years about the Rams draft process (and they all spoke independently from one another in various venues). It's just way too much too overlook, ignore, or try to dismiss through speculation.
So I have defended Snead but at the same time the Robinson pick is what it is--he was absolutely in on it, and AT THE TIME it seemed reasonable.
Recently Snead explained his thinking on the Robinson pick...it was a case of swinging for the fences. What he did not say is that Boudreau was big time behind the pick, but we know THAT from things Boudreau said.
,,,