January 21, 2019 03:04PM | Registered: 14 years ago Posts: 4,224 Status: HOF Inductee |
I'm not ignoring them but that facemask call was subjective in the first place and calling it or not calling it wasn't the difference between the game literally being over. If the Rams get that call, the game isn't over. Different, but not over. Getting half the distance to the goal wasn't going to insure a Rams TD either. I mean, Goff muffed a snap from the 1 in the same game.Quote
Ramkind
Quote
moklerman
The results of 58 minutes of football was that the Rams and Saints were very evenly matched. Both sides made some good plays, both sides made some bad plays, there was good coaching and bad coaching and there was bad officiating. With all of that culminating in the Saints having the ball in FG range and deserving of a PI call and helmet to helmet call. Saints were robbed, no two ways about it.Quote
RockRam
You can’t blame the results of 4 1/2 quarters of football on one non-call.
If the roles were reversed this whole board would be melting down right now.
Why do you choose to just ignore the bad calls against the Rams like the facemask call that would have resulted in a 4 point lead and a completely different last two minutes? Just wondering.
Most reasonable people agree that both calls (and others) were horrible and changed the way the rest of the game would have played out.
You are right....this board would be melting down if the shoe was on the other foot because losing sucks, but ALL Saints fans (unlike Ram fans apparently) would be unapologetic and enjoying the awesome victory knowing that bad calls happened against them earlier and they have nothing to feel dirty about.