We all know it's just an opinion, but it's one I agree with strongly.

I mean, the Rams changing their uniforms again doesn't signify that they are trying to "erase" or "distance" themselves from St. Louis any more than when they moved to St. Louis and changed up the uniforms IMO.

I was really young when they moved to St. Louis, so really I've only known them as the "St. Louis Rams," but I hardly ever called them that. Usually it was just "the Rams."

I'm not from either city, although I am from Missouri, but that's not why I started following the Rams. It was the players and uniforms, especially the helmet, that drew me to them.

Not a big fan of the Blue and Yellows, but they're growing on me, and I don't have a choice anyway. But, I definitely don't see that as the organization's way to somehow move on from St. Louis. They won a Super Bowl in St. Louis for cryin' out loud.

So I guess I also don't see any team moving as wrong in any sense of the word. It's disheartening to see a city have to part ways with a team they connected with, but I guess I'm able to compartmentalize the move from the team itself, even being on the outside looking in, which is probably easier than having grown up being a fan of a team that's in the city in which you reside.

I DO think Stan handled the move badly, and he could've been more respectful and less callous when he tried to make it personal with St. Louis and Missouri as a whole.