Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Probably best that we not get too attached to any single rookie, huh?

May 15, 2018 05:39AM
There are sooooo many opportunities for backup OL and that LB corps is gonna need 3 new starters plus it’s own backups. Not to mention the DL rotation. Whew!

There are good reasons why the Rams loaded up in those 3 areas. Forget the draft status vs UDFA’s. I foresee fierce competition for the pecking order in all of these areas. And I think that it’s way too early to jump on any player’s bandwagon.

I usually tend to have a favorite or two to really step up each camp. Sometimes I’ve nailed it, but sometimes my guy doesn’t even make the 53. Well, this year is probably a good year to just stand aside and let the players and coaches sort this out on the field.

We should expect the unexpected when the dust finally settles.

I’ll say this. No vet backup player should feel complacent, that’s for sure. This is gonna be one tough roster to make.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Probably best that we not get too attached to any single rookie, huh?

Rams43284May 15, 2018 05:39AM

  With limited cap space, vets better beware

RockRam120May 15, 2018 05:57AM

  Disagree - vets are needed if SB bound

RamsFanSince6985May 15, 2018 08:35AM

  Might not be as bad as you think

AlbaNY_Ram89May 15, 2018 09:25AM

  Thanks for the info. I didn't know that. (nm)

RockRam52May 15, 2018 10:20AM

  Re: Might not be as bad as you think

LMU9367May 15, 2018 10:57AM

  Re: Might not be as bad as you think

SoCalRAMatic48May 15, 2018 11:49AM

  Re: Probably best that we not get too attached to any single rookie, huh?

David Deacon82May 15, 2018 09:32AM