Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

He was going to cost $5 mil no matter what.

March 18, 2018 02:33AM
The Rams simply made a prudent move. He was going to be a $5 mil cost even if they outright cut him.
By restructuring, the Rams made it a no-lose proposition for themselves because they don't have to pay him the additional $3 mil, bringing his cap cost down to the $5mil and being able to keep him anyway.

Austin is certainly worth a roster spot. He is better than most any 53rd player on the roster. So since he was a sunk cost anyway, what's wrong with trying to get something out of him? Lord knows he's been a good trooper. No trouble to the team. Not screaming to the press about not being used enough.

And there's been a lot of rumblings that he had a variety of injuries last season that hampered him all year. I don't know the truth of it, but that smoke just won't go away.

He doesn't have to go off too many times to change a game. He's one of those kinds of guys with his playmaking ability.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Rams Restructure Austin to Keep Him from Another Team?

RamBill767March 17, 2018 03:21PM

  Re: Rams Restructure Austin to Keep Him from Another Team?

Classicalwit369March 17, 2018 03:59PM

  Same argument can be made about Watkins.

RockRam194March 18, 2018 02:43AM

  Re: Rams Restructure Austin to Keep Him from Another Team?

reggae250March 17, 2018 04:38PM

  Bust

Ram49266March 17, 2018 10:29PM

  He was going to cost $5 mil no matter what.

RockRam198March 18, 2018 02:33AM

  Re: He was going to cost $5 mil no matter what.

B64 Rams 72183March 18, 2018 08:52AM

  I think that Tavon can best help the Rams by being traded...

Rams43168March 18, 2018 07:40AM