Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Yes....

March 08, 2018 06:40AM
I am not a fan of the 3-4, in any of it's manifestations. I can tolerate it, it can work - no doubt about that, and it grates on me. laughing smiley

I'm also somewhat allergic to the word 'scheme'... which is fault on my part, I admit... BUT... when that word comes up, especially these days, it seems to me to equate with the X's and O's winning the games and not the players themselves, whomever they may be. Obviously one needs a 'scheme', and players that best fit into that scheme, but football, and football players, are an imperfect science... and it seems to me that in today's game 'scheme' takes precedence over 'players' which I think is a mistake... it's a combo, and the best coaches acknowledge and adjust for that.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Does anyone else think the 3/4 is kinda un-Ramsian?

Billy_T396March 08, 2018 05:58AM

  Re: Does anyone else think the 3/4 is kinda un-Ramsian?

NorCalRamFan145March 08, 2018 06:10AM

  Unfortuantely, yes I remember the 2-5

six2stack226March 08, 2018 06:40AM

  Re: Unfortuantely, yes I remember the 2-5

NorCalRamFan133March 08, 2018 06:44AM

  wasn't that a Fritz Shurmur innovation? nm

21Dog142March 08, 2018 08:28AM

  Re: 3-4 is probably a better scheme

merlin150March 08, 2018 06:32AM

  If memory serves...

JamesJM149March 08, 2018 06:48AM

  Yes....

JamesJM145March 08, 2018 06:40AM

  the 3/4 is kinda un-Ramsian? and SB wins.

Coy Bacon149March 08, 2018 07:14AM

  Re: the 3/4 is kinda un-Ramsian? and SB wins.

NorCalRamFan124March 08, 2018 07:23AM