Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: ESPN Power Rankings have Rams at #9...

February 05, 2018 09:46AM
Quote
Rams43
Quote
jemach
New England
Philadelphia
Pittsburgh
Minnesota
Jacksonville
New Orleans
Atlanta
Green Bay

I may have the last few mixed up but you have the idea.

Well, lots might change after FA and the draft, of course.

But why wouldn’t the Eagles be #1?

Belichick is losing both coordinators. That could be a problem.


What direction do Vikings go at QB? Is Keenum legit?

For that matter, is Bortles a legit SB caliber QB?

Without their star QB, do the Packers really scare anybody?

TBH, I think that the Rams should be no worse than 6th on any such list.
I think the reason the Pats are #2 comes down to this the NFC is stacked while the NFC will be the Pats, the Steelers who are more talented but less focused and up and coming Jacksonville and Texans, seems like a pretty clear path for the Pats while the Eagles have a murderers row to contend with in the NFC, the Cowboys, the NFC South 3 (Saints, Falcons, and Panthers), the Vikes and Packers and the Rams, healthy Seahawks and who knows 9ers.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Early odds for Super Bowl 53 and 54 Rams 8th best and 2nd best

The Professor425February 04, 2018 06:19PM

  ESPN Power Rankings have Rams at #9...

jemach127February 05, 2018 06:25AM

  Re: ESPN Power Rankings have Rams at #9...

Rams43111February 05, 2018 07:19AM

  Re: ESPN Power Rankings have Rams at #9...

oldschoolramfan101February 05, 2018 07:37AM

  Re: ESPN Power Rankings have Rams at #9...

RamsDynasty114February 05, 2018 09:46AM