Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Why tagging Sammy Watkins makes sense for Rams

January 10, 2018 05:58AM
His talent is undeniable. His first game with the team you could just see he was better than anyone they'd had in years. If they take him from 70 targets to 100-110 his numbers would of course go up. Woods averaged 7.1 targets/game and Kupp 6.3. Are there enough footballs to go around to also have Watkins average 6-7/game? Does the offense become somewhat more pass heavy?

There is something to be said for having him with them in OTAs and all of camp heading into 2018. I also lean toward overpaying for one year vs. paying long-term.

The transition tag isn't used much in the NFL anymore but maybe that is the way to go. You get to have some level of say in whether he stays or goes purely based on market demand. And paying somewhat less than under the franchise tag.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Why tagging Sammy Watkins makes sense for Rams

RamBill906January 10, 2018 05:10AM

  Well, Rams did with TruJ.

RockRam270January 10, 2018 05:23AM

  Re: Why tagging Sammy Watkins makes sense for Rams

LMU93277January 10, 2018 05:58AM

  Re: Why tagging Sammy Watkins makes sense for Rams

Headslap75338January 10, 2018 06:02AM

  Nope. No compensation for losing Sammy with Transition tag.

RockRam283January 10, 2018 06:10AM

  Re: Nope. No compensation for losing Sammy with Transition tag.

Headslap75282January 10, 2018 06:27AM

  Re: Its going to be tricky

Speed_Kills266January 10, 2018 06:38AM

  Re: Its going to be tricky

PHDram281January 10, 2018 07:49AM

  Re: I will say

Speed_Kills223January 10, 2018 09:44AM

  Re: I will say

oldschoolramfan393January 10, 2018 10:04AM

  lol

PHDram220January 10, 2018 10:27AM

  Re: lol

bigjimram21340January 10, 2018 11:33PM

  Re: Same thing I was saying........

oldschoolramfan203January 11, 2018 07:31AM

  Can't do that

AlbaNY_Ram368January 11, 2018 12:08AM

  You know, that non-exclusive tag makes a ton of sense to me...

Rams43303January 10, 2018 07:01AM

  Assuming the Franchise Tag cost about $16M/yr....

RAMbler283January 10, 2018 07:41AM

  Re: Assuming the Franchise Tag cost about $16M/yr....

oldschoolramfan338January 10, 2018 07:45AM

  Re: they might just transition tag him

merlin236January 10, 2018 09:19AM

  Re: they might just transition tag him

PHDram220January 10, 2018 01:22PM

  Re: they might just transition tag him

SoCalRAMatic313January 10, 2018 02:53PM

  trouble with transition tag

Anonymous User223January 10, 2018 10:59PM

  Re: oh I didn't realize that... do you mean the franchise tag? nm

Speed_Kills302January 10, 2018 09:46AM

  They both carry the same cost

AlbaNY_Ram260January 11, 2018 12:13AM

  Re: They both carry the same cost

Rams43302January 11, 2018 06:15AM

  Re: You know, that non-exclusive tag makes a ton of sense to me...

bigjimram21238January 10, 2018 11:46PM

  5 reasons to lock up Watkins

qwords269January 11, 2018 03:59AM

  Here's a reason NOT to lock up Watkins but to let him go.

RockRam251January 11, 2018 04:50AM

  Re: Here's a reason NOT to lock up Watkins but to let him go.

oldschoolramfan219January 11, 2018 05:06AM

  Re: Here's a reason NOT to lock up Watkins but to let him go.

AlbaNY_Ram225January 11, 2018 05:25AM

  The Rams SHOULD NOT make significant changes...

jemach243January 11, 2018 05:56AM

  Not so. It is exactly as Snead said: "saving dollars" is not the intent

RockRam259January 11, 2018 07:08AM

  Re: The Rams SHOULD NOT make significant changes...Winner jemach.

oldschoolramfan231January 11, 2018 07:39AM

  +1 Je

ferragamo79197January 11, 2018 07:52AM

  Re: The Rams SHOULD NOT make significant changes...

AlbaNY_Ram227January 11, 2018 09:12AM