Battered Ram Syndrome
|
|
"Battered Ram Syndrome." We've all got it, but I think your symptoms are showing. 25 years of losing (minus 1999-2003) will do that to you, so it's nothing to feel ashamed of. 
I mean, of course we could lose the game. But there's a flipside to your post: what are the Vikings' weaknesses? Where are they not as crisp as they could be? If they were the perfect team they'd be 9-0, right? Sure, we have to play in their house, but then again, our strength is road games where we're undefeated (and throw in an extra one for London).
You're not the only person I've seen focus on our weaknesses. I'd love to see an analysis of how the Vikes can be had. So far all I've heard (from literally everyone) is a vague sort of, "Man, they're just good everywhere." Well, so are we on paper. But we see some of the warts cause we're closer. Would be interesting to talk with a heady Vikes fan about what they think their warts are.
Personally, I have confidence McVay and staff will figure out how to dissect the Vikings in time to pull out the 'W'.
I mean, of course we could lose the game. But there's a flipside to your post: what are the Vikings' weaknesses? Where are they not as crisp as they could be? If they were the perfect team they'd be 9-0, right? Sure, we have to play in their house, but then again, our strength is road games where we're undefeated (and throw in an extra one for London).
You're not the only person I've seen focus on our weaknesses. I'd love to see an analysis of how the Vikes can be had. So far all I've heard (from literally everyone) is a vague sort of, "Man, they're just good everywhere." Well, so are we on paper. But we see some of the warts cause we're closer. Would be interesting to talk with a heady Vikes fan about what they think their warts are.
Personally, I have confidence McVay and staff will figure out how to dissect the Vikings in time to pull out the 'W'.
