Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Really? Based on a couple of games?

October 18, 2017 03:39AM
Young teams, with new HCs', rookie or very young QBs, and new systems are going to have their ups and downs. Heck, even established teams have them (Pats, Steelers to name a couple).

McVay was never the football god that some held him up as; nor is he in over his head. The media (and unfortunately some fans) tend to put their favorite players and coaches on pedestals and when they fail to live up to the fans' or media expectations, suddenly that player or coach isn't so hot after all......nobody likes being disappointed.

To me what is happening with the Rams is development. The Rams are finally in a position to act like the stock market; over time it goes up and it goes down, but the trend is always up. We've seen the O perform really well; we've the seen the D perform really well; and we've seen our STs perform really well.....just not all in the same game. That's the trick. And when that starts happening then it needs to transform into consistency.

Will it happen? Hard to know. But I think the Rams have the HC and staff, and they have the QB and many good pieces.
I don't think McVay is screwing up at all. This is just a young team growing and the typical uneven rate that they do.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  McVay that good or Fisher that bad

RounderRick1173October 17, 2017 06:19PM

  I agree with the 2 guys on the show NM

six2stack510October 17, 2017 06:20PM

  different philosophies

FootballGenius510October 17, 2017 06:30PM

  I am going to make this PG since there are women on this board

Los Angeles Lenny388October 17, 2017 07:02PM

  Re: I am going to make this PG since there are women on this board

waterfield367October 17, 2017 08:23PM

  Is that the guy

RamUK325October 18, 2017 05:44PM

  Re: I am going to make this PG since there are women on this board

Classicalwit300October 19, 2017 04:13AM

  lol

Los Angeles Lenny310October 19, 2017 09:35AM

  Re: McVay that good or Fisher that bad

Rams43330October 17, 2017 07:12PM

  Both nm

XXXIVwin315October 17, 2017 07:27PM

  The Jag win was Fishball

Blue and Gold603October 17, 2017 08:32PM

  Re: The Jag win was Fishball

CraigMatson313October 17, 2017 11:40PM

  I don't agree with the label of Fishball

RockRam332October 18, 2017 02:11AM

  You have your definition, I have mine

Blue and Gold307October 18, 2017 02:14AM

  one difference

zn367October 18, 2017 03:22AM

  Re: You have your definition, I have mine

JYB419October 19, 2017 07:47AM

  Re: I don't agree with the label of Fishball

guinnessram308October 18, 2017 11:22AM

  Excellent post sorta changed my...

BumRap303October 20, 2017 07:36AM

  one key difference

Los Angeles Lenny298October 18, 2017 04:38AM

  Re: The Jag win was Fishball

21Dog276October 18, 2017 04:39AM

  Yeah, it's not the normal game by McVay

Blue and Gold305October 18, 2017 02:19PM

  McVay is trending downwards

Rams_81508October 18, 2017 02:50AM

  McVay has met a dose of reality

NewMexicoRam416October 18, 2017 02:54AM

  Really? Based on a couple of games?

RockRam364October 18, 2017 03:39AM

  Re: Really? Based on a couple of games?

Rams43273October 18, 2017 07:29AM

  Yes boxing each player into specific roles

Rams_81318October 19, 2017 04:49PM

  Seriously?

RamFanEsq324October 18, 2017 05:44AM

  It is not the results but the manner of the regression

Rams_81320October 19, 2017 04:50PM

  Agreed

FootballGenius286October 18, 2017 02:37PM

  Rams are a play or two from being UNDEFEATED!

Ramgator338October 18, 2017 03:52AM

  Well said.

RockRam520October 18, 2017 05:10AM

  Re: Well said...4-2 is Perfect!!!!

oldschoolramfan316October 18, 2017 05:52AM

  The game passed him by

Los Angeles Lenny331October 18, 2017 05:00AM

  Fisher wasn't that bad IMO

psxpaul374October 18, 2017 09:45AM

  Re: Fisher wasn't that bad IMO

Rams43339October 18, 2017 10:02AM

  Re: Fisher wasn't that bad IMO

Rampage2K-319October 18, 2017 10:53AM

  Agreed, for all Fisher's (many!) faults, he built well.

ArizonaRamFan301October 18, 2017 02:53PM

  Re:or snead did nm

VANRAM380October 18, 2017 05:12PM

  Re: Fisher wasn't that bad IMO

dzrams446October 18, 2017 11:02AM

  Re: Fisher wasn't that bad IMO

RAMSINCE ARNETT324October 18, 2017 12:05PM

  Re: Fisher wasn't that bad IMO

waterfield341October 18, 2017 12:10PM

  it gets down to one thing

zn422October 18, 2017 05:15PM

  Re: it gets down to one thing

VANRAM319October 18, 2017 05:24PM

  Re: it gets down to one thing

zn296October 18, 2017 05:31PM

  Re: other things can be said...

dzrams300October 18, 2017 05:34PM

  Re: other things can be said...

zn324October 18, 2017 05:40PM

  Re: other things can be said...

dzrams324October 18, 2017 05:47PM

  Re: other things can be said...

zn319October 18, 2017 05:50PM

  Re: it gets down to one thing

VANRAM318October 18, 2017 08:26PM

  ceilings

wv ram258October 18, 2017 05:25PM

  Re: ceilings

zn323October 18, 2017 05:37PM

  Fisher was not bad on defense or special teams

Rams_81267October 19, 2017 04:51PM

  Mcvay=looking good so far. Fishface= proven terrible.

guinnessram282October 18, 2017 11:24AM

  I thought Last Sunday was more reminiscent of MartyBall

six2stack332October 18, 2017 12:06PM

  I agree with that analogy

Los Angeles Lenny254October 19, 2017 11:36AM

  Re: McVay that good or Fisher that bad

AZRamsfan65311October 20, 2017 07:18AM