Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Yeah, I couldn't decide 9 or 10 OL, so went with 10.

August 31, 2017 12:04PM
They could go 7 WRs, I just don't think they will because it is hard to deploy that many.

They could go an extra LB.

They could go an extra DB (S or Ccool smiley.

So much of this will depend, I think, on who they think are the best players. For instance if they think they only have 9 OL that are worth keeping; or they really like a couple of the DBs or LBs or whatever and don't think they can get them through waivers to the PS.

I also think it is inevitable that they'll pick up a player or two off of waivers because they are so high this year in when it's their turn to take a guy or pass on him. Bound to be somebody they like on another team that'll get cut.

Snead is always dinking around with the bottom of the roster anyway.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Pre-cutdown 53 wag.

RockRam571August 31, 2017 08:45AM

  Pretty spot on, just 2 disagreements

TonyHunter87353August 31, 2017 08:53AM

  2 disagreements

CROMWELL21276August 31, 2017 08:59AM

  Yeah, I could be talked in to those changes.

RockRam367August 31, 2017 09:09AM

  I would agree with your assessment

NewMexicoRam246August 31, 2017 08:54AM

  Re: Pre-cutdown 53 wag.

Rams43262August 31, 2017 11:40AM

  Yeah, I couldn't decide 9 or 10 OL, so went with 10.

RockRam206August 31, 2017 12:04PM

  Re: DB a tough cut?

leafnose179September 01, 2017 05:47AM