Goff took issue with the characterization of him "struggling" because of the INTs in practice.
He said because it's practice he took some chances that he normally wouldn't in games.
However there was an implication that he probably wouldn't continue taking as many chances in practice (McVay weighing in and saying not to?)
It seems to me that some of these guys are over scrutinized in practice. Practice is the place you learn, try new things, take some extra risks, etc. Not everything is going to go well as a result.
The games are what counts; not practice. We've all heard about guys who do great in practice but it never seems to translate to the field. And just the opposite as well: Kurt Warner was known as a poor practice player. But everything changed on game day. Wonder if what was "poor" was simply taking more risks and trying different things during practice because it didn't count?
