Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: The charge coachspeak shouldn't depend on personal feelings...

August 17, 2017 08:37AM
Quote
Rams43
Quote
zn
Quote
CraigMatson

So yep a multipurpose threat you need to create a game package for as long as you have him.

Agreed.

McVay talks about him with a lot of interest in what he can do.

The issue is health, looks like.

.

C'mon, zn.

What HC in his right mind is gonna criticize one of his players publicly? Please...

All HC's are gonna twist themselves into a pretzel to try to find something nice to say about their players. Especially their starters. Right up until they sometimes trade or release them.

Seems foolish to give too much weight to that sort of obvious coachspeak.

Isn't there a difference between criticizing a player publicly and going out of your way to say positive things about the player?

I don't know about you 43 but I clearly remember many coaches declining to say anything positive about a player or simply opting to not mention the players name when discussing the team.

I don't see a bunch of pretzel twisting when it comes to coaches and haven't seen any from McVay. From what I can tell, he's a pretty straight shooter.

Also, are we to take this to mean you're going to ignore all positive comments from McVay about other players from now on? Or are we just choosing to believe the positive comments about some players depending on how we personally feel about said player?

I've seen you make a big deal about McVay's positive comments about other players without calling it "coachspeak." Usually it's because you personally feel positive about that player. In the name of consistency, positive comments about a player shouldn't be dismissed simply because you feel negative about that player.

Anyway...on to the more substantive discussion about Tavon....

Earlier in the thread you asked if anyone honestly sees Tavon getting snaps ahead of Watkins, Woods, and Kupp and if anyone thought that those 3 WR's would get McVay more big plays than Tavon?

If we're looking for big, explosive plays, I see Tavon right behind Watkins.

We can call Woods, Kupp, Reynolds, Cooper, and Thomas better WRs than Tavon if that pleases you but not one of them has proven to be a better playmaker.

I have hope that Everett will turn out to be a great playmaker but he's a rookie and unproven right now.

Proven playmakers on the Rams right now are Watkins, Gurley, and Tavon. That's it.

Moreover, I don't expect Kupp and Woods to be big play producers. I don't even see that as their role. They are there to move the chains.

We will all eventually see but I'm confident that McVay and Snead are serious about their intentions to use Tavon as an all around playmaking weapon.

The snaps issue will be resolved by McVay using a varied attack and unlimited combos between all of his weapons.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Is Tavon Austin worth the money for the Rams? (Article)

Rams43777August 16, 2017 10:47AM

  Ooh! Ooh! Pick me!

rambleon513August 16, 2017 10:48AM

  LMAO

ferragamo79362August 16, 2017 10:59AM

  prove it year

wv ram348August 16, 2017 10:51AM

  Here is a list of Tavon's "Prove it" years:

rambleon309August 16, 2017 12:09PM

  Re: I still suspect they're trying to move him

merlin302August 16, 2017 12:54PM

  Re: I still suspect they're trying to move him

Rams43243August 16, 2017 02:32PM

  why would they want the cap hit?

zn285August 16, 2017 02:53PM

  Re: well we're talking IF here right?

merlin279August 16, 2017 07:09PM

  Re: well we're talking IF here right?

zn285August 16, 2017 07:18PM

  Re: Depends on the trade return tbh

merlin262August 17, 2017 07:50AM

  Re: Depends on the trade return tbh

zn349August 17, 2017 08:07AM

  5 mil isn't that much tbh

TonyHunter87283August 17, 2017 09:03AM

  yep, agreed, zn...

SunTzu_vs_Camus398August 17, 2017 08:09AM

  5 years in the league

TonyHunter87471August 17, 2017 09:07AM

  Re: 5 years under Fisher...

dzrams238August 17, 2017 09:13AM

  Re: 5 years under Fisher...

TonyHunter87340August 17, 2017 09:18AM

  Re: Fair enough. We'll see (nm)

dzrams247August 17, 2017 09:37AM

  yeah that sums it up nicely (nm) ...

zn355August 17, 2017 09:17AM

  but that cant be true

wv ram295August 16, 2017 01:27PM

  He might have two years to prove it.

CeeZar345August 16, 2017 11:08AM

  Re: I agree...it is possible

dzrams453August 16, 2017 11:18AM

  How can anyone know?

Atlantic Ram296August 16, 2017 12:49PM

  No

Ram49323August 16, 2017 03:12PM

  it;s simple

zn339August 16, 2017 04:37PM

  Re: it;s simple

Rams43277August 16, 2017 07:04PM

  Re: it;s simple

zn293August 16, 2017 07:20PM

  Re: it;s simple

Rams43283August 16, 2017 07:42PM

  Re: it;s simple

zn420August 16, 2017 08:07PM

  Re: it;s simple

CraigMatson285August 17, 2017 02:20AM

  Re: it;s simple

zn289August 17, 2017 05:54AM

  Re: it;s simple

Rams43281August 17, 2017 06:03AM

  right

snowman289August 17, 2017 06:11AM

  Re: The charge coachspeak shouldn't depend on personal feelings...

dzrams264August 17, 2017 08:37AM

  Re: it;s simple

CraigMatson249August 17, 2017 06:36AM

  Re: it;s simple

Rams43268August 17, 2017 05:39AM

  I directly answered your question

zn289August 17, 2017 05:42AM

  Re: I answered your question directly

Rams43242August 17, 2017 05:43AM

  So no then

TonyHunter87342August 17, 2017 09:12AM

  Some of us aren't going overboard on Kupp yet...

DaJudge291August 17, 2017 09:11AM

  I'm not that fragile.....

JamesJM234August 17, 2017 06:17PM

  And supposing TA is the piece of crap

reggae254August 17, 2017 08:23PM