Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Here's the problem with that thinking...

June 16, 2017 08:56AM
Quote
max
Quote
Rams43
Quote
max
Sure, you could say they should not have bet so much on upside at #2 overall. But that has worked out to great benefit in the past.

A much bigger mistake was losing Jenkins and keeping Austin. Because they KNEW or should have known what they had in those 2 players after having them for a few years. That was a much worse evaluation by Snead. And I'm gonna assume he was part of those evaluations and should have forced the issue even if Fisher balked. And I doubt Fisher did. He wanted to keep Jenkins. So I put the Jenkins/Austin mess mostly on Snead.

I think that the JJ decision came down to a bang for the buck thing for the Rams, max. Pure and simple.

IOW, it's not that they didn't know what he could do or that they didn't want him. They just didn't want him at a salary beyond a certain point. And the Rams were confident in their ability to find and develop another CB talent to replace him, if necessary.

JJ, on the other hand, insisted on top dollar. Can't say that I blame him, either. Plus, history shows that he was right about his value.

Therefore, I can't say that the JJ "mistake" was on a par with the GRob mistake. Picks at #2 overall in a loaded draft don't come along very often. GRob was a colossal "might have been".

As to Austin? Man, that was an epic fubar that still defies explanation. No hindsight needed on that bad call. The league is probably still laughing at that mistake. That one I put on Fisher, btw.

If they didn't think they were going to sign JJ then they would have signed Trumaine and not just tagged him. They tagged Tru expecting to sign JJ and that was there plan to make their secondary "Priority 1" as Snead said.

Instead, they botched the entire thing. And as a result they ended up without JJ and had to tag Tru another time at an exorbitant cost. That is terrible management by Snead and Demoff.

We are in agreement that they botched the entire JJ/TruJo thing, max.

They miscalculated their ability to sign BOTH players.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  All this could've been Mack talk is silly

headslapper870June 15, 2017 07:39PM

  Re: All this could've been Mack talk is silly

zn361June 15, 2017 08:43PM

  Re: All this could've been Mack talk is silly

dzrams365June 15, 2017 09:49PM

  Re: All this could've been Mack talk is silly

zn542June 16, 2017 03:57AM

  Re: All this could've been Mack talk is silly

dzrams268June 16, 2017 08:27AM

  Re: All this could've been Mack talk is silly

zn288June 16, 2017 08:52AM

  agreed...

SunTzu_vs_Camus383June 16, 2017 05:42AM

  I wanted the wide receiver from Clemson who was taken by the Bills

GreatRamNTheSky356June 16, 2017 02:32AM

  In fairness, GRob wasn't the biggest mistake..

max423June 16, 2017 04:08AM

  Austin

LMU93327June 16, 2017 04:51AM

  so many moves, so many mistakes

21Dog332June 16, 2017 05:15AM

  Re: so many moves, so many mistakes

zn288June 16, 2017 05:34AM

  It's worth noting, the mistakes...

JamesJM233June 16, 2017 06:09AM

  Re: It's worth noting, the mistakes...

zn298June 16, 2017 07:02AM

  Re: It's worth noting, the mistakes...

JamesJM297June 16, 2017 07:26AM

  Re: It's worth noting, the mistakes...

zn268June 16, 2017 08:48AM

  Re: so many moves, so many mistakes

sacram277June 16, 2017 06:43AM

  Re: so many moves, so many mistakes

Rams43257June 16, 2017 06:54AM

  Re: so many moves, so many mistakes

sacram283June 16, 2017 07:35AM

  Re: so many moves, so many mistakes

Rams43278June 16, 2017 07:39AM

  Re: so many moves, so many mistakes

sacram276June 16, 2017 09:36AM

  Re: so many moves, so many mistakes

zn289June 16, 2017 07:17AM

  Ok, point taken (nm)

sacram258June 16, 2017 07:36AM

  +1

FootballGenius319June 16, 2017 08:04AM

  Re: so many moves, so many mistakes

FootballGenius282June 16, 2017 07:52AM

  Re: In fairness, GRob wasn't the biggest mistake..

Rams43302June 16, 2017 06:30AM

  Here's the problem with that thinking...

max279June 16, 2017 08:18AM

  but I will offer this...

LMU93283June 16, 2017 08:47AM

  Re: but I will offer this...

dzrams254June 16, 2017 08:55AM

  Re: Here's the problem with that thinking...

Rams43305June 16, 2017 08:56AM

  And here's the main thing about that miscalculation...

max281June 16, 2017 10:54AM

  could have had Brady 5 times....

Rampage2K-264June 16, 2017 08:59AM

  Re: All this could've been Mack talk is silly

Classicalwit425June 16, 2017 05:04PM