Re: Bigger loss to Rams...Pete Holohan or London Fletcher??

Forum List Message List New Topic Print View

May 22, 2017 05:36PM

Registered: 14 years ago
Posts: 13,917
Status: HOF Inductee

Both big losses but to me the difference is Holohan was 31 and didn't do much after leaving the Rams. Fletcher was 26 and went on to 11 more very good seasons. He should never ever have been allowed to leave. That was a huge leadership void on defense.

Reply Quote

RSS

Subject	Author	Views	Posted
Bigger loss to Rams...Pete Holohan or London Fletcher??	Ramgator	565	May 22, 2017 03:01PM
Re: Great question......Pete Holohan.	oldschoolramfan	201	May 22, 2017 03:54PM
I do not think of the GSOT as a flash in the pan....	JamesJM	198	May 22, 2017 03:59PM
Mike's ego killed the GSOT	Rampage2K-	304	May 22, 2017 04:05PM
Be that as it may...	JamesJM	256	May 22, 2017 04:08PM
Re: Be that as it may...	Rampage2K-	216	May 22, 2017 04:16PM
Thing is, Vermeil did not stay and...	Ramgator	190	May 23, 2017 06:47AM
Martz would have been hired as a HC	PeoriaRa	187	May 23, 2017 07:08AM
Fletcher, easily	six2stack	166	May 23, 2017 07:50AM
Re: Mike's ego killed the GSOT	Ramdom	187	May 23, 2017 09:58AM
Re: Bigger loss to Rams...Pete Holohan or London Fletcher??	LMU93	312	May 22, 2017 05:36PM
Played at a HOF level	ferragamo79	212	May 22, 2017 08:03PM
But the overall , long term impact was bigger with Holohan.	Ramgator	157	May 23, 2017 06:49AM
Fletcher	PeoriaRa	282	May 23, 2017 09:54AM

Previous Message Next Message

Forum List Message List New Topic Print View

RamsFootballFans.com Bucky's Pub The RamsFootballFans.com Tailgate Party Game Time Forum Help and Support Forum Jack Youngblood Chat Jim Everett Chat Kevin Demoff Chat Deacon Jones Chat Thursday April 5th at 9pm est.Mike Karney Q&A Announcements Recent Messages