Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: one possible reason why not

Previous Message Next Message
Forum List Message List New Topic Print View
dzrams
May 15, 2017 03:25PM
I've seen research posted somewhere that historically Philips has not had highly paid ILBs. They have usually been inexpensive late round draftees. I haven't researched that myself but if it's true there's a good reason why not.
Reply Quote
RSS
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Rams see LB Mark Barron 'fitting in' to new system

RamBill988May 15, 2017 04:34AM

  Rams appear Set to Keep Barron at LB/ PFF

RamBill447May 15, 2017 04:47AM

  Re: Rams appear Set to Keep Barron at LB/ PFF

canuckramsfans350May 15, 2017 07:44AM

  Re: Rams appear Set to Keep Barron at LB/ PFF

oldschoolramfan295May 15, 2017 10:04AM

  Re: Rams appear Set to Keep Barron at LB/ PFF

tonyde324May 15, 2017 10:19AM

  why not?

zn308May 15, 2017 11:11AM

  Re: why not?

TonyHunter87305May 15, 2017 03:08PM

  Re: why not?

zn255May 15, 2017 04:48PM

  Re: one possible reason why not

dzrams258May 15, 2017 03:25PM

  Re: why not?

tonyde335May 15, 2017 03:57PM

  Re: why not?

zn304May 15, 2017 04:55PM

  so we dont want a lb

PHDram274May 15, 2017 01:06PM

  for 2017 I believe it

LMU93312May 15, 2017 10:37AM

  Barron is a good player

snowman393May 15, 2017 01:01PM

  Broncos ILBs under Phillips

zn348May 15, 2017 04:52PM
Previous Message Next Message
Forum List Message List New Topic Print View



RamsFootballFans.comBucky's PubThe RamsFootballFans.com Tailgate PartyGame Time ForumHelp and Support ForumJack Youngblood ChatJim Everett ChatKevin Demoff ChatDeacon Jones Chat Thursday April 5th at 9pm est.Mike Karney Q&AAnnouncements Recent Messages