Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

why not?

May 15, 2017 11:11AM
Quote
tonyde
I doubt he's a Ram in 2018. When it comes down to it, their not going to want to pay a 215 lb Safety 10 million a year to play LB. He's limited as a LB and that won't change.

This is a one-gap 3/4 with the stress on attacking gaps, not taking on guards. So on paper anyway it should work. Look at Arizona. Last year, with converted safety Deone Bucannon at one ILB spot, the Arz defense was 2nd in the league in yards allowed, 9th against the run, and 3rd in yards per rushing attempt. So starting Bucannon at ILB did not hurt them any. Barron has basically the same size and profile as Bucannon.

At the combine Burcannon was 6'0" & 211 pounds.

If Barron can't play, it's him, not the idea or the position. So maybe he does not live up to billing as a player, but the idea is sound---there is already evidence you can use a converted safety at ILB in a 1-gap scheme.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Rams see LB Mark Barron 'fitting in' to new system

RamBill989May 15, 2017 04:34AM

  Rams appear Set to Keep Barron at LB/ PFF

RamBill447May 15, 2017 04:47AM

  Re: Rams appear Set to Keep Barron at LB/ PFF

canuckramsfans351May 15, 2017 07:44AM

  Re: Rams appear Set to Keep Barron at LB/ PFF

oldschoolramfan295May 15, 2017 10:04AM

  Re: Rams appear Set to Keep Barron at LB/ PFF

tonyde324May 15, 2017 10:19AM

  why not?

zn308May 15, 2017 11:11AM

  Re: why not?

TonyHunter87305May 15, 2017 03:08PM

  Re: why not?

zn255May 15, 2017 04:48PM

  Re: one possible reason why not

dzrams259May 15, 2017 03:25PM

  Re: why not?

tonyde335May 15, 2017 03:57PM

  Re: why not?

zn304May 15, 2017 04:55PM

  so we dont want a lb

PHDram274May 15, 2017 01:06PM

  for 2017 I believe it

LMU93312May 15, 2017 10:37AM

  Barron is a good player

snowman394May 15, 2017 01:01PM

  Broncos ILBs under Phillips

zn348May 15, 2017 04:52PM