Quote
9er8er
Should be obvious. There weren't as many good offensive lineman as usual, but there were still plenty good enough for 72% of the league to take one and several actual good teams with better O-lines than the Rams to draft more than one of them. Yet, none good enough for the Rams.
Why do you think that is? You think it's that the Rams are just that much smarter than 3/4 of the league because they've done such a bang up job showing us that in the past?
More fractured logic, 9er8er.
If 72% of the league drafts an OL in a weak (the weak part can't be overstated) OL draft, then we should, too? Is that what you're going with?
We didn't draft a QB, either. Or a tailback. Could it be that we didn't because we thought what we had was better than what was available after the 3rd round?
Could it be that the same thing applied to interior OL?
This is too easy. Now I'm REALLY done.
