Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Not sure I am understanding the Trade Barron stuff now

March 20, 2017 02:38AM
I think Barron has been very. Productive the last two years but I'm wary teams will figure out how to take away his effectiveness if he is consistently lined up at the same spot at inside linebacker.
If they haven't figured out who the strong safety is they should consider moving Barron there.
Mo Alexander could a better fit at inside linebacker even though he isn't proto either.
They may be readying Webster for FS .
At least that would be one question resolved.
A trade of Barron may have merit but a trade should only happen if they have a replacement with improved ability and size to take on and shed blocks otherwise Barron stays and they set him at different angles to make it tough to get him blocked.
Barron is a football player but he isn't untouchable or without weakness.
Touch and go to work around some shortcomings but his disruptive flashes are pretty attractive as well as his substantial consistent nose for the ball when he's unblocked.
I expect a big offer would be the only way it gets done. Other wise he's a game day chesspiece for us.
A very interesting one too.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/20/2017 02:42AM by CraigMatson.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  I thought for certain Cleveland would trade for Barron...

jemach634March 19, 2017 05:33PM

  Re: I thought for certain Cleveland would trade for Barron...

dzrams196March 19, 2017 06:23PM

  Re: I thought for certain Cleveland would trade for Barron...

TonyHunter87145March 19, 2017 08:23PM

  Not sure I am understanding the Trade Barron stuff now

GreatRamNTheSky151March 19, 2017 11:54PM

  Re: Not sure I am understanding the Trade Barron stuff now

CraigMatson113March 20, 2017 02:38AM

  Re: Not sure I am understanding the Trade Barron stuff now

GreatRamNTheSky108March 20, 2017 02:55AM

  Fair to question how Barron fits

LMU93108March 20, 2017 03:03AM

  Reynolds was 6-1, 232 and........

21Dog118March 20, 2017 05:05AM

  Re: Reynolds was 6-1, 232 and........

CraigMatson94March 20, 2017 05:51AM

  Barron makes no sense

TonyHunter8783March 20, 2017 10:35AM

  Re: Barron makes no sense

CraigMatson72March 20, 2017 12:01PM

  didnt you just say....

PHDram95March 20, 2017 05:38AM