Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Which '16 Ram starter is least likely to be a '17 Ram starter?

February 06, 2017 11:22AM
Poll
Who is least likely to be a '17 starter, IYO?
Only registered users are allowed to vote for this poll.
28 votes were received.
Tim Barnes17
 
61%
Tavon Austin. Yeah, I said it, lol.1
 
4%
Lance Kendricks3
 
11%
Gregg Robinson (any position)4
 
14%
Mark Barron1
 
4%
E J Gaines1
 
4%
Mo Alexander0
 
0%
William Hayes1
 
2%



I didn't include Britt, TruJo, or TJM because of the uncertainty of their likelihood of being extended. If extended, all are overwhelming favorites to be starters, I think.

Please give this a minute of thought before a knee jerk reaction to choose the whipping boy GRob.

New HC, new DC, new OC, new OL coach, new WR coach, etc... you get the picture.

The new staff just might look at all these guys a whole lot differently than we do right now. Some players more positively, some others more negatively (if possible).

I'm gonna choose Tim Barnes as least likely carryover to start. We can definitely do better, I think.

What's your call?

And a brief explanation would be great, too.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 02/06/2017 11:28AM by Rams43.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Which '16 Ram starter is least likely to be a '17 Ram starter?

Rams43673February 06, 2017 11:22AM

  Looks like Tim Barnes is our landslide "winner"...

Rams43212February 07, 2017 05:15AM

  Has to be Barnes

LMU93209February 07, 2017 05:21AM