January 21, 2017 09:43AM | Registered: 14 years ago Posts: 21,111 Status: HOF Inductee |
Quote
leafnose
would make sense in their g4 funding, or whatever they use to assist in revenue for these immense projects
the citizens of wiser townships have had enough of initiatives that heap big money towards stadiums
however, I still don't understand the vote in San Diego against the hotel tax. Clearly, I missed a poison pill in that referendum.
the first blush sure seemed to put the funding on the tourist industry.
still listening to sports radio from there, and the fans are scorched.
but in this instance, there were years on years to try to Jack Murphy stadium addressed.
all the infrastructure for such facilities would still be upon the city no matter where they built. So that does run big dough. Gotta think that ranges up towards 150 million? more?
I am still surprised by the turn of events. otoh, cities that give huge sums to owners should get vested interest in part ownership of the team. The numbers too big not to have some concrete commitment and return on investement.
Subject | Author | Views | Posted |
---|---|---|---|
There should be a cap on CITY stadium spending! | Ramgator | 453 | January 21, 2017 04:49AM |
Re: a ceiling..... | leafnose | 196 | January 21, 2017 08:26AM |
Re: a ceiling..... | Rampage2K- | 199 | January 21, 2017 09:43AM |
The cap should be 0 | Rams_81 | 171 | January 21, 2017 11:49AM |