Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: LA Rams: Re-Signing The Defensive Backs Is the Team’s “Priority A”

December 27, 2016 12:33PM
Los Angeles Rams: Re-Signing The Defensive Backs Is the Team’s “Priority A”
[www.turfshowtimes.com]

Los Angeles Rams’ General Manager Les Snead says re-signing their secondary is the team’s top priority...
by brandon bate@NoPlanB_ Feb 25, 2016, 6:39pm CST

There are needs. And there are priorities. And Los Angeles Rams’ General Manager Les Snead knows the difference.

Snead has never shied away from talking about how he approaches the NFL Draft. Needs and wants are two totally different things in his eyes.

Back in February of 2013, just one year into his role with the team, Snead had this to say about what teams need to do...

Sometimes when you ‘need’ something, you become desperate. When you’re desperate, you can make bad decisions.

And Snead, whether wrong or right, has stayed true to his word in that regard. For the most recent example, look no further than 2015 when the Rams selected Georgia running back Todd Gurley. If one were listing the Rams’ needs prior to that draft, running back would’ve been well behind offensive line and quarterback. Yet Gurley was the top player on their board, and Snead and Co. drafted him....regardless of need.

Les Snead spoke earlier today at the NFL Combine in Indianapolis. He had plenty to say about the team and their direction, all while trying not to give up too much information about their intentions.

But Snead let those in attendance know what their top priority was...and it wasn’t drafting/signing a quarterback. It was retaining the free agents in the secondary:

If I were to prioritize what's going on in our building, and there's a lot of things going on, that is priority A right now, even at this combine. We'll meet with their reps, maybe more than one time at the combine, and I'm not going to say anything gets done, but we’ve got a lot going on here and that’s priority A.

To be clear, because there are several, the Rams’ current list of [top] free agents in the secondary are [in no particular order]: Janoris Jenkins, Trumaine Johnson, Mark Barron, and Rodney McLeod.

But negotiations may have hit a snag earlier this week. And Jenkins, who is probably the team’s top priority, took to twitter to let Snead & Co. know how he felt about their initial offer.

But that’s the art of negotiation, and it’s a whole lot newer to Jenkins than it is to Snead. It certainly doesn’t mean the Rams will allow him to walk, nor does it mean Jenkins thinks the negotiations are over. And so they dance.

Regardless, Snead’s comments today give credence to the notion that Jenkins was less than accepting of the team’s initial offer to retain him.


Whether he’s talking specifically about Jenkins - or about the free agent defensive back crop as a whole - remains to be seen. But for now, with no new deals, we can only assume "the number" is what’s holding us back from a clearer picture of the Rams’ defensive depth chart for 2016.



Best,
Laram
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  A pretty straightforward quote from Fisher...

laram1271December 27, 2016 06:43AM

  BUT...Who was running your offense? NM

Crazylegs369December 27, 2016 06:46AM

  Re: A pretty straightforward quote from Fisher...

oldschoolramfan452December 27, 2016 06:50AM

  +++1.

dodgerram347December 27, 2016 06:53AM

  I agree again!

SunTzu_vs_Camus422December 27, 2016 06:55AM

  ^ +2. nm

NewMexicoRam320December 27, 2016 09:39AM

  yeah, perhaps....but I don't see how it's Snead.

SunTzu_vs_Camus415December 27, 2016 06:54AM

  Re: yeah, perhaps....but I don't see how it's Snead.

zn344December 27, 2016 09:05AM

  Re: yeah, perhaps....but I don't see how it's Snead.

Rams43326December 27, 2016 09:29AM

  Re: yeah, perhaps....but I don't see how it's Snead.

zn346December 27, 2016 09:52AM

  Re: yeah, perhaps....but I don't see how it's Snead.

Rams43364December 27, 2016 10:20AM

  Re: yeah, perhaps....but I don't see how it's Snead.

zn523December 27, 2016 12:41PM

  Re: yeah, perhaps....but I don't see how it's Snead.

Rams43340December 27, 2016 02:48PM

  Re: yeah, perhaps....but I don't see how it's Snead.

zn256December 27, 2016 03:02PM

  interesting point (nm

wv ram287December 27, 2016 11:13AM

  Vacation means nothing...

jemach296December 27, 2016 02:16PM

  Re: A pretty straightforward quote from Fisher...

Rams43380December 27, 2016 07:03AM

  FishHead just won't let it go nm

six2stack299December 27, 2016 09:09AM

  I was dead wrong....

JamesJM313December 27, 2016 09:33AM

  Yeah, well, Fisher NEVER got all that out of JJ..

RockRam307December 27, 2016 10:07AM

  he got 5 years $62 million......

Rampage2K-324December 27, 2016 10:11AM

  Re: he got 5 years $62 million......

zn297December 27, 2016 01:02PM

  Re: he got 5 years $62 million......

Rampage2K-451December 27, 2016 01:15PM

  Re: he got 5 years $62 million......

zn227December 27, 2016 02:01PM

  Re: he got 5 years $62 million......

Rampage2K-463December 27, 2016 02:05PM

  Re: he got 5 years $62 million......

zn292December 27, 2016 02:11PM

  Re: "Short memories"...

laram537December 27, 2016 10:16AM

  Since when did deception become straight forwardness?

9er8er388December 27, 2016 10:45AM

  Re: Since when did deception become straight forwardness?

laram328December 27, 2016 10:48AM

  Not the full definition

9er8er350December 27, 2016 11:10AM

  Re: Considerable dubiety here...

laram470December 27, 2016 11:27AM

  Re: Considerable dubiety here...

9er8er498December 27, 2016 11:38AM

  Re:You do know that it takes "two" to tango, right?

laram333December 27, 2016 11:55AM

  They tagged the wrong guy

dodgerram290December 27, 2016 12:00PM

  I know this

9er8er303December 27, 2016 12:24PM

  Re: LA Rams: Re-Signing The Defensive Backs Is the Team’s “Priority A”

laram344December 27, 2016 12:33PM

  Yeah, and??? LOL

9er8er379December 27, 2016 01:00PM

  Re: They didn't they "still" could have afforded Tru and Jenks...

laram330December 27, 2016 01:27PM

  There aren't really such "ifs"

9er8er314December 27, 2016 02:04PM

  Re: We're talking about the Rams here...

laram329December 27, 2016 02:10PM

  Or in other words, we're talking about Jeff Fisher here

9er8er294December 27, 2016 02:19PM

  Re: Correction...

laram294December 27, 2016 02:26PM

  No, here's the proper context

9er8er287December 27, 2016 02:40PM

  Re: No this is blatantly false...

laram306December 27, 2016 02:42PM

  Nope

9er8er279December 27, 2016 02:55PM

  Re: Fisher chooses to coach Rams over Dolphins...

laram347December 27, 2016 02:58PM

  Can do this all day

9er8er379December 27, 2016 03:43PM