LOL...in order...
| December 04, 2016 06:54PM |
(1) >>"If there is anybody on this board arguing that winning doesn't matter to Stan, I haven't seen them. Maybe I've missed it or maybe you continue to misrepresent it."<<
You've missed it. Several people have said it, not only in recent days and weeks - but going back to when the move back to LA was still just a rumor.
(2) >>"You also appear to be implying that Fisher's future with the team coming down to these last 4 games makes some kind of reasonable sense that could justify the extension."<<
(This one may be my favorite)
For you to even suggest this means you have not bothered to read a SINGLE post of mine regarding Fisher since he was hired. Which begs the question - why are you starting now? Ask ANYONE here - everyone knows I can't stand Fisher and wanted him gone a long time ago. To (again) make things simple for you: In my opinion - NOTHING COULD JUSTIFY FISHER BEING EXTENDED. HE SHOULD NEVER HAVE BEEN HIRED.
So - you missed again!
(3) >>"And you talk about sanity in the process. That's pretty interesting stuff"<<
Yes. As is reading - and comprehending - what people write and think instead of going by assumptions or ridiculous guesses. I was against the Fisher hire from the beginning - and have been one of his most vocal and consistent critics. And I am thus quite sane. But again, one would have to pay attention to what people actually WRITE, and not just look for possible arguments wherever they can find them.
So...yep, yet another miss.
Three swings, three misses.
And with that, you're out.
I will bid you farewell.
It's been fun, if exhausting...
sanfRAM
You've missed it. Several people have said it, not only in recent days and weeks - but going back to when the move back to LA was still just a rumor.
(2) >>"You also appear to be implying that Fisher's future with the team coming down to these last 4 games makes some kind of reasonable sense that could justify the extension."<<
(This one may be my favorite)
For you to even suggest this means you have not bothered to read a SINGLE post of mine regarding Fisher since he was hired. Which begs the question - why are you starting now? Ask ANYONE here - everyone knows I can't stand Fisher and wanted him gone a long time ago. To (again) make things simple for you: In my opinion - NOTHING COULD JUSTIFY FISHER BEING EXTENDED. HE SHOULD NEVER HAVE BEEN HIRED.So - you missed again!
(3) >>"And you talk about sanity in the process. That's pretty interesting stuff"<<
Yes. As is reading - and comprehending - what people write and think instead of going by assumptions or ridiculous guesses. I was against the Fisher hire from the beginning - and have been one of his most vocal and consistent critics. And I am thus quite sane. But again, one would have to pay attention to what people actually WRITE, and not just look for possible arguments wherever they can find them.
So...yep, yet another miss.
Three swings, three misses.
And with that, you're out.
I will bid you farewell.
It's been fun, if exhausting...
sanfRAM
