I have a question for the many folks who write posts that more or less assume that Kroenke will not fire Fisher and will in fact extend him.
Note: I am NOT here raising the question of whether or not Fisher should be fired. This is a question about
how we might imagine Kroenke responding to an off season after another season of sub-.500 mediocrity.
My question: Why? Why do folks so often write in frustrated anguish, pre-emptively despairing of our getting rid of Fisher? I don't understand that assumption, and am genuinely asking.
