Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Yeah zn, you did reference "last 3 games" for penalties.

November 12, 2016 06:34AM
Quote
guinnessram
Quote
zn
Quote
guinnessram
Quote
zn
You still however have no real response to the fact that the 1st 2 games were more heavily penalized than what followed.

....

I never denied that the 1st 2 games were more heavily penalized than what followed..


Then we have no disagreement.

.


I interpreted your "last 3 games" reference as an attempt to prove that penalties aren't a problem under Fisher. Which is it?

t.

I posted what I posted because it's more accurate.

You are in constant "coach war" mode and I am not.

When I post something like this is a more accurate picture of the penalties, you therefore get to fightin cause for you everything is for or against Fisher.

Well it isn't for me.

I posted what I posted because it was a more accurate picture. You misread that if you think everyone is in the same coach war you're in, every single post. I am not only NOT in coach war every single post, I get tired of it when that's all I see on a board. Not everything has to be 2 sides board warring over the coach. Even if that's the way you tend to be...not everyone is.

Now if, instead of just flat misreading, you ask directly, zn do you think they commit too many penalties? (Leave "under Fisher" out of it).

I would say, they could afford to cut back the offensive penalties but aggressive defenses like Seattle and Denver just tend to get penalized, so I don't think that's going to abate.

That would be my real answer.

If you tried to press it and said "but I deeply emotionally require assent and agreement on my Fisher wars view," I would just say "enh, sorry, I don't do that every single topic 24/7, that's just me."

Accurate is accurate, whether it reflects well or badly on the coach.

I tend to not do coach wars EVERY SINGLE DOGGONE POST because there's no point to it. If Ogletree is doing well I want to say, Ogletree is doing well without it being taken as simply "aha defending/criticizing Fisher I see."

I avoid that like the plague, frankly.

So if you see coach war statements in all my posts, that's you seeing it there, not me putting it there.

.

...



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 11/12/2016 06:48AM by 73Ram.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  We had 109 penalty yds, moves us to 29th overall.

guinnessram475November 09, 2016 11:15AM

  Re: We had 109 penalty yds, moves us to 29th overall.

zn424November 09, 2016 12:55PM

  Re: We had 109 penalty yds, moves us to 29th overall.

poplarbluffman390November 10, 2016 02:52AM

  Yeah zn, you did reference "last 3 games" for penalties.

guinnessram392November 10, 2016 07:59AM

  Re: Yeah zn, you did reference "last 3 games" for penalties.

zn294November 11, 2016 04:08AM

  Re: Yeah zn, you did reference "last 3 games" for penalties.

guinnessram246November 12, 2016 05:43AM

  Re: Yeah zn, you did reference "last 3 games" for penalties.

zn191November 12, 2016 05:45AM

  Re: Yeah zn, you did reference "last 3 games" for penalties.

guinnessram355November 12, 2016 06:06AM

  Re: Yeah zn, you did reference "last 3 games" for penalties.

zn293November 12, 2016 06:34AM

  Re: Yeah zn, you did reference "last 3 games" for penalties.

guinnessram263November 12, 2016 06:57AM

  This is at a standstill.....

73Ram275November 12, 2016 07:01AM

  Re: This is at a standstill.....

zn292November 12, 2016 07:03AM

  thanks.....nm

73Ram261November 12, 2016 07:04AM

  Re: Yeah zn, you did reference "last 3 games" for penalties.

zn324November 12, 2016 07:02AM

  Re: Yeah zn, you did reference "last 3 games" for penalties.

guinnessram275November 12, 2016 07:26AM

  Re: We had 109 penalty yds, moves us to 29th overall.

sfbayram310November 10, 2016 03:46AM

  what percentage of the penalties are defense

Rams_81286November 10, 2016 03:51AM

  Rams are 3rd in defensive penalties, 15th in offensive penalties

zn306November 11, 2016 04:28AM

  These stats just don't match the site you gave me.

guinnessram323November 12, 2016 06:35AM