Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Well, I'm with you on your premise

November 10, 2016 02:21PM
Quote
zn
Quote
CraigMatson
If they were going to make him a bigger cog it all should have been worked through, perfected to satisfactory levels above what we have
Just not good enough now.

And my view is he's not a receiver. Using him as one, that is as a pure receiver (or purely as a receiver) is only going to do so much.

Last year they used him perfectly. As many runs as catches. Made him a better decoy too.

So if they just added some of this year's routes to last year's multiple run/catch weapon, IMO he would be much more effective.

...

I won't say they used him "perfectly" last year. But you are right that trying to make him a marquee type receiver has been an utter fail. The "chuck it up" plays they've done the last three weeks have been an embarrassment to watch (he'll never thread two CBs on him and go and get the ball. Ever), and while his route running has improved, he's a snake receiver in that I always expect the drop with him. Yes, he's improved, it's still been hit and miss.

Anyway, what I was agreeing with you on was that they need to use him more creatively in the run game. As much as I love Benny, I'd like to see him in 3rd and long sets just to act as the outlet, or the decoy outlet. They "know" you aren't keeping him back there to block, but it sure would limit some of the jailbreak if he's on the field. I understand his physicality limits what you can do because he's never kept in as a blocker, but they're sure better than the "throw two yards behind the LOS and see if he can shake free" plays. They have to be creative and I'm just not seeing that level of thinking from Boras.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Rams still waiting for Tavon Austin to pay off

RamBill879November 09, 2016 04:45AM

  Re: Rams still waiting for Tavon Austin to pay off

Tony Romas403November 09, 2016 04:53AM

  He Is Gone After The Season Ends

troublefree480November 09, 2016 06:14AM

  not at that price

Hazlet Hacksaw406November 09, 2016 06:34AM

  Austin's contract

LMU93536November 09, 2016 06:50AM

  they're not using him right this year

zn462November 09, 2016 06:53AM

  they need a new direction on offense

Hazlet Hacksaw341November 09, 2016 07:09AM

  I dont agree

zn397November 09, 2016 07:25AM

  So they are basically wasting a $42 million Asset now

Hazlet Hacksaw400November 09, 2016 07:33AM

  I don't look at it that way

zn362November 09, 2016 08:42AM

  I agree with that

Hazlet Hacksaw537November 09, 2016 08:50AM

  Re: So they are basically wasting a $42 million Asset now

Classicalwit395November 09, 2016 06:07PM

  I differ on that my friend

zn369November 10, 2016 04:53AM

  Re: I dont agree

BobCarl368November 09, 2016 03:46PM

  Re: I dont agree

zn363November 09, 2016 03:52PM

  Re: I dont agree

CraigMatson379November 09, 2016 05:15PM

  Re: I dont agree

zn283November 09, 2016 05:28PM

  Re: I dont agree

Classicalwit353November 09, 2016 06:12PM

  Re: I dont agree

CraigMatson366November 09, 2016 06:36PM

  Re: I dont agree

zn333November 09, 2016 08:09PM

  Well, I'm with you on your premise

Old Goat554November 10, 2016 02:21PM

  Re: Rams still waiting for Tavon Austin to pay off

Rams43570November 09, 2016 06:58AM

  Dexter McCluster 2.0

ferragamo79526November 09, 2016 07:39AM

  Re: Dexter McCluster 2.0

Ramit391November 11, 2016 06:33AM

  Re: Dexter McCluster 2.0

Ohiorams467November 12, 2016 02:38AM

  Re: Rams still waiting for Tavon Austin to pay off

Anonymous User523November 09, 2016 08:51AM

  TA= Definition of Bust nm

Ram49325November 09, 2016 09:05AM

  disagree

zn399November 09, 2016 09:18AM

  #8 pick. lost picks. minimal production

Ram49475November 09, 2016 09:39AM

  yeah we're just going to disagree

zn373November 09, 2016 10:05AM

  Re: yeah we're just going to disagree

LMU93553November 10, 2016 03:52AM

  I agree....that said comparing a player like

ferragamo79636November 10, 2016 03:03PM

  Re: I agree....that said comparing a player like

zn389November 10, 2016 03:14PM

  Re: disagree

poplarbluffman468November 09, 2016 09:47AM

  Yep. DAnthony Thomas, Ace Saunder, Dexter McCluster etc.NM

Ram49367November 09, 2016 03:15PM

  Re: Yep. DAnthony Thomas, Ace Saunder, Dexter McCluster etc.NM

CraigMatson362November 09, 2016 03:19PM

  Re: disagree

waterfield422November 10, 2016 03:09PM

  Could have had Mcleod and maybe Jenkins with that money

promomasterj518November 09, 2016 10:08AM

  Re: Could have had Mcleod and maybe Jenkins with that money

CraigMatson662November 09, 2016 03:08PM