Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

I dont agree

November 09, 2016 07:25AM
Quote
Hazlet Hacksaw
Or a new director. Maybe all the Boras changes have screwed up Austin and the oline.

Well in the spirit of friendly banter...

not sure how changing yet again fixes things if the problem was change.

Either way I have no problem whatsoever with the philosophy. To me this is all execution.

I don't think they screwed up Austin. They actually added to his game to an extent. The problem is assuming you can use him more as a pure receiver. He's not a pure receiver. What we're seeing IMO is about as much as you can get from him using him that way.

Last year he had as many runs as catches. Plus he was an effective decoy. That's how you use Austin, I think.

BUT he could be an even more effective version of that--ie. of what he was last year---if they also retained the bits here and there they added to his game.

So I would use Austin the 2015 way, just adding a few of the 2016 tweaks to the mix. He did improve in some specific ways, ie. in the routes he can run effectively. It;s just that OVERALL he's just simply not a pure receiver.

So I guess my view is, it's a mixed bag. Some gains, but not enough to warrant using him in more of a pure receiver role; better IMO to use him they way they did last year while adding some of the new stuff to THAT mix.

....
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Rams still waiting for Tavon Austin to pay off

RamBill879November 09, 2016 04:45AM

  Re: Rams still waiting for Tavon Austin to pay off

Tony Romas402November 09, 2016 04:53AM

  He Is Gone After The Season Ends

troublefree480November 09, 2016 06:14AM

  not at that price

Hazlet Hacksaw405November 09, 2016 06:34AM

  Austin's contract

LMU93536November 09, 2016 06:50AM

  they're not using him right this year

zn461November 09, 2016 06:53AM

  they need a new direction on offense

Hazlet Hacksaw341November 09, 2016 07:09AM

  I dont agree

zn396November 09, 2016 07:25AM

  So they are basically wasting a $42 million Asset now

Hazlet Hacksaw400November 09, 2016 07:33AM

  I don't look at it that way

zn361November 09, 2016 08:42AM

  I agree with that

Hazlet Hacksaw536November 09, 2016 08:50AM

  Re: So they are basically wasting a $42 million Asset now

Classicalwit394November 09, 2016 06:07PM

  I differ on that my friend

zn368November 10, 2016 04:53AM

  Re: I dont agree

BobCarl367November 09, 2016 03:46PM

  Re: I dont agree

zn362November 09, 2016 03:52PM

  Re: I dont agree

CraigMatson379November 09, 2016 05:15PM

  Re: I dont agree

zn283November 09, 2016 05:28PM

  Re: I dont agree

Classicalwit352November 09, 2016 06:12PM

  Re: I dont agree

CraigMatson366November 09, 2016 06:36PM

  Re: I dont agree

zn333November 09, 2016 08:09PM

  Well, I'm with you on your premise

Old Goat554November 10, 2016 02:21PM

  Re: Rams still waiting for Tavon Austin to pay off

Rams43570November 09, 2016 06:58AM

  Dexter McCluster 2.0

ferragamo79526November 09, 2016 07:39AM

  Re: Dexter McCluster 2.0

Ramit391November 11, 2016 06:33AM

  Re: Dexter McCluster 2.0

Ohiorams465November 12, 2016 02:38AM

  Re: Rams still waiting for Tavon Austin to pay off

Anonymous User523November 09, 2016 08:51AM

  TA= Definition of Bust nm

Ram49325November 09, 2016 09:05AM

  disagree

zn399November 09, 2016 09:18AM

  #8 pick. lost picks. minimal production

Ram49475November 09, 2016 09:39AM

  yeah we're just going to disagree

zn373November 09, 2016 10:05AM

  Re: yeah we're just going to disagree

LMU93552November 10, 2016 03:52AM

  I agree....that said comparing a player like

ferragamo79636November 10, 2016 03:03PM

  Re: I agree....that said comparing a player like

zn389November 10, 2016 03:14PM

  Re: disagree

poplarbluffman468November 09, 2016 09:47AM

  Yep. DAnthony Thomas, Ace Saunder, Dexter McCluster etc.NM

Ram49367November 09, 2016 03:15PM

  Re: Yep. DAnthony Thomas, Ace Saunder, Dexter McCluster etc.NM

CraigMatson362November 09, 2016 03:19PM

  Re: disagree

waterfield421November 10, 2016 03:09PM

  Could have had Mcleod and maybe Jenkins with that money

promomasterj517November 09, 2016 10:08AM

  Re: Could have had Mcleod and maybe Jenkins with that money

CraigMatson661November 09, 2016 03:08PM