Quote
Deadpool
They (IMO, you cannot talk about Snead without Fisher) have had what I would call hits on defense, but the offensive side of the ball has been downright brutal.
2012- Brian Quick, I. Pead, Chris Givens, Rok Watkins, Daryl Richardson - IMO that's 0 for 5 hits
2013 - Tavon Austin, Stedman Bailey, Barrett Jones, Zac Stacy - IMO that's 0-4 hits
2014 - Greg Robinson, Tre Mason, Garrett Gilbert, Mitchell Van Dyk, Demetrius Rhaney - IMO 0-5 hits
2015 - Gurley, Rob Havenstein, Jamon Brown, Sean Mannion, Andrew Donnal, Bud Sasser, Cody Wichmann - Normally in my world you get 2 plus years before I deem someone a hit or a miss or a bust, right now I would say 2-7 hits (Gurley and Havenstein even though both are having subpar seasons, they where good last year)
Now, my definition of hit says Snead (and Fisher) is 2- 21 hits or 9.5% hit rate. That is not good.
Defensively, they are much higher 8-15 IMO, or 53%
Overall, throwing in GZ they are 11-37 hits not including 2016 draft or 29.7%, so according to your 40% benchamark, Snead is falling short.
I applied the same logic to every team I looked at to get a comparison.
I counted as a hit starters and significant role players such as nickel backs, together with any back-ups who did decently well (as Wichman did last year).
The teams I looked at were Green Bay, the Giants, and the Steelers. I did 2004-2008 on those teams so you could get a clear read.
It's not a grading system, it's a "basic percentages" system so that people who say goofy things like "they suck" have to look at realistic bottomlines. Grading is different--you evaluate quality then. I am only interested in basic hits at this point so that people get what percentages constitute good drafting.
If someone is lost due to off field issues I don't count them in the totals. That kind of thing is no reflection at all on the team's evaluations. Excluding 2016, cause it's way too soon, I look at 2012-15 and I count as hits
Brockers, Quick, Jenkins, Johnson, Zuerlein, Austin, Ogletree, McDonald, Robinson, Donald, Joyner, Alexander, Gaines, Gurley, Havenstein, Brown, and Wichman.
That's 17. Subtracting Bailey and Mason (off-the-field losses), they had 35 picks. That's 48.5%. Without getting into quality, which is a separate discussion.
Remember, when I did the Packers, Giants, and Steelers the criteria was the same.
For you to come up with a comparison, you have to set a standard and do other teams according to YOUR criteria. That is just looking at the Rams in isolation is meaningless. What are the basic hit percentages on good drafting teams.
...
....
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/30/2016 08:25AM by zn.
