Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

This is absolutely right and anyone thinking otherwise is kidding themselves

October 27, 2016 10:09AM
Quote
waterfield
While there can be genuine debate in the HC's ability in this day and age I honestly believe that he Snead, Demoff, and Kroenke are all on the same page when it comes to CK and Goff. And I think they are right! There simply is way too much of an investment in the future to risk Goff losing his mojo behind this O line. And that is a real possibility no matter how talented a qb is. Once you repeatedly get hit you will begin to hear steps and it will take a long time -if ever-to get over the anxiety. And yes the O line is really THAT bad! And that is also why we don't see the same tailback we saw a year ago. Until we have turned the corner re the O line we are simply stuck and to risk the franchise qb and his future is not the brightest thing to do. These guys coming at the qb are all big, ugly, smelly, and they use foul language.

There is NO question that they all agree on what to do, and how to do it. And they think that's the smartest way. So fans who are gnashing their teeth about Goff not starting yet are wasting time and bandwidth. Especially since Fisher said he wasn't going to rush him, there is no timetable and he will play when they feel like he will play well.

It's like a friend texting you that they are coming over after work and you respond "OK see you later". Then when they show up you are surprised and become angry about it.

Fisher told us this was how it was going to go..........but rage on to those who want to rage on. I'm at the point where I'm enjoying watching people flip out over it.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/27/2016 10:09AM by LesBaker.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  The Head Coach

waterfield1224October 25, 2016 07:01AM

  Re: The Head Coach

dodgerram541October 25, 2016 07:06AM

  Re: The Head Coach

Rams43478October 25, 2016 07:48AM

  Re: The Head Coach

waterfield396October 25, 2016 11:28AM

  Well, for my mental well being...

JamesJM360October 25, 2016 11:31AM

  My fear now....

Guard468October 25, 2016 11:37AM

  Re: My fear now....

bigjimram21351October 25, 2016 12:03PM

  No you're right...

Guard451October 25, 2016 12:19PM

  Re: No you're right...

bigjimram21294October 25, 2016 12:39PM

  we'll have our 3rd...just not our 1st rounder.

SunTzu_vs_Camus411October 26, 2016 05:34AM

  Nope...

Guard362October 26, 2016 06:36AM

  Re: Nope...

SoCalRAMatic349October 26, 2016 07:08AM

  Which just begs the question...

Guard353October 26, 2016 07:55AM

  Re: Which just begs the question...

Rams43486October 26, 2016 09:14AM

  Lemme try to remember....

JamesJM337October 26, 2016 09:20AM

  Re: Which just begs the question...

dzrams332October 27, 2016 07:37AM

  ????

SunTzu_vs_Camus324October 26, 2016 01:15PM

  Re: ????

zn330October 26, 2016 01:27PM

  Re: The Head Coach

dodgerram389October 25, 2016 11:40AM

  So....

DaJudge420October 25, 2016 07:50AM

  Re: So....

waterfield387October 25, 2016 11:13AM

  Might as well pull the OL too...

max614October 25, 2016 11:16AM

  Re: Might as well pull the OL too...

bigjimram21343October 25, 2016 12:04PM

  Re: Might as well pull the OL too...

waterfield362October 25, 2016 01:01PM

  Re: Might as well pull the OL too...

zn378October 27, 2016 04:04AM

  so what happens next year

ferragamo79493October 25, 2016 11:32AM

  Re: so what happens next year

bigjimram21329October 25, 2016 12:06PM

  Re: so what happens next year

waterfield476October 25, 2016 12:43PM

  Re: The Head Coach

bigjimram21261October 25, 2016 11:57AM

  Re: The Head Coach

no name305October 26, 2016 06:15AM

  There are very few ...

LARams17522October 25, 2016 12:10PM

  Re: There are very few ...

waterfield338October 25, 2016 12:51PM

  Something to consider, I think...

JamesJM260October 25, 2016 01:00PM

  Re: Something to consider, I think...

waterfield345October 25, 2016 01:04PM

  Ok, you are confusing me a little...

JamesJM352October 25, 2016 01:09PM

  Re: Ok, you are confusing me a little...

waterfield252October 25, 2016 02:33PM

  That's fair...

JamesJM394October 25, 2016 02:45PM

  Re: That's fair...

LARams17347October 26, 2016 08:12AM

  Which personnel decisions do you feel were organizational?

PaulButcher59339October 25, 2016 01:05PM

  Re: Which personnel decisions do you feel were organizational?

waterfield307October 25, 2016 02:21PM

  Re: Which personnel decisions do you feel were organizational?

PaulButcher59398October 25, 2016 02:31PM

  Re: Which personnel decisions do you feel were organizational?

waterfield394October 25, 2016 02:36PM

  Re: Which personnel decisions do you feel were organizational?

PaulButcher59331October 25, 2016 02:42PM

  Re: Which personnel decisions do you feel were organizational?

waterfield337October 25, 2016 05:34PM

  Re: Which personnel decisions do you feel were organizational?

PaulButcher59358October 25, 2016 05:45PM

  Re: Which personnel decisions do you feel were organizational?

zn661October 27, 2016 05:07AM

  Ok, but it wasn't just that...

JamesJM328October 25, 2016 02:47PM

  Hell, I STILL believe it...

JamesJM359October 25, 2016 02:26PM

  This is absolutely right and anyone thinking otherwise is kidding themselves

LesBaker367October 27, 2016 10:09AM

  Re: This is absolutely right and anyone thinking otherwise is kidding themselves

-X-424October 27, 2016 02:26PM