I agree that he wants to win. I don't think that's disputable. I also agree that he wanted to provide some stability to the HC position in an attempt to mirror 'The Patriot Way'. But I don't think that's the
only reason he hired Fisher. It was also the way the Patriots mold unwanted or otherwise unheralded talent into players who flourish in the system that's appealing to Kroenke, and Fisher shows some tendencies of modeling that behavior. But I don't think he has it down quite yet. Mostly because his QBs have been middle-lower tier guys and his coordinators haven't necessarily panned out. But he appears to be following a plan that closely models how the Patriots do it. He just hasn't mixed together the right recipe of coaches and players. Some of that is his responsibility, and some of it isn't. You have to (HAVE TO) account for bad luck in this overall snapshot of his coaching career with the Rams so far. Have to do it if you're even remotely objective.
In Tennessee he started out his first 4.5 years with unwanted results before the following decade provided Ownership with 6 playoff appearances and a Superbowl berth. With 6 different starting QBs, no less. In the middle of that, the Titans experienced EXACTLY what the Rams experienced in 2008/2009. Cap problems and extensive injuries (it's really worth researching this in depth). What immediately followed that decade was two years of contention with Ownership and an unceremonious departure. I think Kroenke researched all of that when weighing his decision to hire Fisher, and I think he'll remain patient - if even just for a little while - to see if he can get similar results. I think he likes the way Fisher does things, because - again - it fits nicely within his vision of how to develop and run a football Franchise. I also think a hefty portion of Kroenke's initial interview with Fisher was to determine his compatibility with the long term plan and long term goals he intended to put in place. Specifically, doing things 'The Patriot Way'.