Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: some said cutting 4 players to sign Jenkins would be good

October 20, 2016 11:21AM
Quote
Ramadune
Quote
ferragamo79
Too.

Gaines and Hill have struggled. Limited depth.

Jenkins was always going to take the highest contract anywhere he could get. These huge contracts always hurt you and throw things out of balance. The Indianapolis Colts owner lamented the huge contract they gave Luck right after they signed him. The Lions couldn't keep Suh, but Miami took him. He's not helping Miami.

Funny you want depth, but if you sign Jenkins for the money he wanted, you hurt your depth elsewhere.

Yeah, it sucks...can't blame Jenks for trying to make the most money he can, but sure would be refreshing to see a player or two these days to take a little less to stay with the team.

No way could we afford what the Giants gave Jenks, with all the other contracts that will be due soon.... Btw, Jenks still loves to bite, I can see a long TD on him this week coming!!!



[www.instagram.com]
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  PFF: Ranking all 32 secondaries entering week 7

LMU93610October 20, 2016 09:09AM

  Re: PFF: Ranking all 32 secondaries entering week 7

Rampage2K-268October 20, 2016 10:52AM

  some said Jenkins wouldn't be missed

ferragamo79309October 20, 2016 11:07AM

  Re: some said cutting 4 players to sign Jenkins would be good

Ramadune285October 20, 2016 11:16AM

  This is the problem with Drafting Robinson

Rams_81306October 20, 2016 11:20AM

  Re: This is the problem with Drafting Robinson

Rampage2K-253October 20, 2016 11:25AM

  Re: some said cutting 4 players to sign Jenkins would be good

Rampage2K-275October 20, 2016 11:21AM

  You hit the nail on the head! I want that to happen!

Ramadune333October 20, 2016 09:58PM