Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Here's a controversial question for you...

October 20, 2016 07:52AM
Here are Tavon's '16 stats. [www.espn.com]

Please focus on his '16 WR stats only.

They are declining and are at underwhelming levels thus far this year. They just are.

This is despite Fisher's orders to force feed him, mind you.

Sooooo... what would be so wrong about sitting Tavon and starting a healthy Spruce or Cooper in the slot for a series or two? A SERIES or two, lol.

I mean, it's not as if Tavon's WR production would be greatly missed, would it?

And we just might be surprised at the boost that one of these rookies would provide. Especially Spruce.

Call it a scientific experiment, if you like. But either the rookie will make plays as a WR or he won't. If he thrives, it's a team win. If both rookies struggle (which Tavon is already doing anyway), then at least we would know it's not a Tavon problem.

And please. Don't be distracted by the Tavon contract or his successes in the past as a RB or PR. Those are irrelevant. I'm talking about the WR snaps here, only.

And just for a series or two.

While I'm at it, I might as well double down and suggest starting Benny over Gurley for a series or two. Benny has looked very good in brief snaps behind the same OL that Gurley has been struggling behind. Why not run an experiment? Might prove once and for all whether it's a Gurley problem or an OL problem.

Heck, what do we have to lose, anyway? We're 3-3 and on a 2 game losing streak. Playoffs would require us to finish 7-3, at least. Probably 8-2, frankly.

Anybody think that's likely to happen? Me neither. Sigh...



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/20/2016 07:53AM by Rams43.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Here's a controversial question for you...

Rams43778October 20, 2016 07:52AM

  it's not a matter of Cunningham over Gurley

LMU93343October 20, 2016 08:26AM

  Re: it's not a matter of Cunningham over Gurley

Rams43339October 20, 2016 09:12AM

  Re: it's not a matter of Cunningham over Gurley

bigjimram21287October 20, 2016 06:30PM

  Re: Here's a controversial question for you...

RamJr304October 20, 2016 10:41AM

  My worry would be do these players you mention.....

roman18350October 20, 2016 10:55AM

  Re: Here's a controversial question for you...

bigjimram21325October 20, 2016 06:27PM

  Re: Here's a controversial question for you...

Rams43342October 20, 2016 07:16PM

  only problem is those guys don't make 42 mill

TonyHunter87336October 20, 2016 06:37PM