Rams have the 32 offense in the NFL 2 straight seasons and here is what they have drafted
1) #1 pick in the draft with Goff (for 2 first rounds, 2 second rounders, and some more change)
2) #2 pick in the draft at tackle Greg Robinson
3) #10 pick in the draft at RB Todd Gurley (Although most believe he would be a top 3 pick had he not had the injury)
4) #8 pick in the draft at WR Tavon Austin (Traded up using No. 16, No. 46, No. 78 and No. 222)
5) #30 pick in first round in the draft at WR Kenny Britt
6) #33 pick early 2nd round in the draft at WR Brian Quick
7) #57 pick in 2nd round in the draft at RT Rob Havenstein
That there is a ton of high draft picks with very little production and a ton of underachieving. Really? You don't think a little bit sarcasm can be justified when you have all those assets of high pick players playing and we get this production?
There is a little helplessness feeling when you load up on top picks and players underachieve that no matter who comes in to play it will be more of the same.
Tell me this, what team has had the #1 pick in the draft trading up using what they used for Goff, a #2 pick in the draft at left tackle, the runningback a #10 pick in the draft, but would have been a top 3 pick had not been the injury, a #8 pick in the draft at WR, and on and on and get so little out of an enormous amount of player assets used? The gap between what these players should be able to deliver and what they are is the biggest gap in NFL history.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/10/2016 03:21AM by Rams_81.
