Quote
LMU93
I agree, that's usually the point where you can see what's what.
The SF loss could turn out to be this game where the team got a wake up call and responded. They did have a players only meeting as a response to that game. It's possible that the new leadership for the team is more proactive and demanding than guys like Long and JL were. I always liked those 2 but it;s possible they were too passive as leaders.
In other words, it's possible that if you really want to know who these Rams are, you have to see them as changing after that game.
But...2 games after the SF game is too soon to say that, really. It's an interesting possibility but there's nothing firm to base it on yet.
6 games in, ie. 5 games after the SF game, ought to be enough though.
...
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/30/2016 10:53AM by zn.
