Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Pretty simple really.

September 16, 2016 03:52AM
Well-run franchises with good teams don't move. All of the teams on your list were bad the year before they moved. And with the exception of Cleveland, who had one good year leading up to the move, they all were bad for a few years.

So it should be no surprise that teams in new cities suck. They sucked before the moves too.

Quote
zn
Some teams that moved--how they did:

Arizona lost their first 2 and went 7-9.
The year before in StL they went 7-9, winning 4 and 5 games in the previous years.
Baltimore won their opener but then lost the next 2 and went 4-12.
They went 5-11 in their last year in Cleveland, winning 11 and 7 games in the previous years.
Indianapolis lost their opener, won game 2, and went 1-3 in their first 4 games and 4-12 for the season.
They went 7-9 in their last season in Baltimore, winning 0 and 2 games in the previous years.
Tennessee won their opener and then lost 4 and went 8-8
They went 8-8 in their last season in Houston, winning 7 and 2 games in the previous years.
St.Louis won 4 to open the season but then ended up 7-9.
They went 4-12 in their last season in LA, winning 5 and 6 games in the previous years.

The one real winning team was the Raiders, in both moves. In the 82 strike year the LA Raiders won their opener and then went 8-1. When they moved back to Oakland in 95, they won their opener and then ended up 8-8.

.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Is anyone else bothered by the Brocker's quote

sacram1206September 15, 2016 08:51PM

  Re: Is anyone else bothered by the Brocker's quote

zn529September 15, 2016 09:17PM

  Ah, there it is, the moving excuse...

max767September 16, 2016 01:58AM

  Re: Ah, there it is, the moving excuse...

zn476September 16, 2016 05:47AM

  Re: Ah, there it is, the moving excuse...

no name487September 16, 2016 05:48AM

  rich brooks

stlramz584September 16, 2016 06:05AM

  Re: rich brooks

zn515September 16, 2016 06:25AM

  Re: rich brooks

stlramz377September 16, 2016 11:46AM

  It was an away game for goodness sake

Drew2839319September 16, 2016 01:36PM

  Pretty simple really.

CeeZar500September 16, 2016 03:52AM

  Exactly!

max421September 16, 2016 06:27AM

  Re: Exactly!

Rams43288September 16, 2016 06:30AM

  Re: Exactly!

max499September 16, 2016 06:38AM

  No, why should I be bothered by it?

GreatRamNTheSky452September 16, 2016 02:37AM

  Indeed

~lyser423September 16, 2016 03:27AM

  unacceptable but true...

LMU93363September 16, 2016 03:38AM

  You will never convince Max

GreatRamNTheSky372September 16, 2016 04:46AM

  Re: You will never convince Max

73Ram367September 16, 2016 04:49AM

  So if max is convinced, then everything gets better?

max415September 16, 2016 05:43AM

  Re: Is anyone else bothered by the Brocker's quote

The_Zone391September 16, 2016 05:39AM

  The players who've been on this team a while seem to have a stock library of excuses

promomasterj391September 16, 2016 08:10AM

  Oh c'mon...

Suh-weet!518September 16, 2016 06:43AM

  Soooooo...

Guard364September 16, 2016 06:51AM

  Don't get me wrong...

Suh-weet!385September 16, 2016 07:28AM

  let's be clear on one thing though

zn655September 16, 2016 08:14AM

  Re: let's be clear on one thing though

sacram372September 16, 2016 11:02AM

  I don't know why they lost SO badly

Suh-weet!505September 16, 2016 11:56AM

  Re: I don't know why they lost SO badly

zn360September 16, 2016 12:59PM