And believe me, it's much appreciated by one and all.
But ANY camp reporter has only one set of eyeballs and there is so much to watch that can be distracting. So it's easy to understand how two or more camp reporters could come away with two opposing impressions of the play of any given practice player. One reporter only sees a good play and another reporter only sees a bad play by the same player at the same practice.
Fortunately, there are multiple eyeballs by multiple professional coaches watching just the WR drills, for example. Then there's the eye in the sky that misses nothing. Film review when knowing what play was called is invaluable.
That's why I try to refrain from questioning camp reports that provide conflicting opinions on a given player.
Having said all that, I think that it's clear that there will inevitably be a couple of excruciating cuts necessary at the WR position, alone. Nice problem to have, but still...